ArticleBMC cancer2025
Evaluation of intraductal carcinoma and invasive cribriform carcinoma as predictors of genetic mutations in systemic treatment-naïve prostate cancer patients.
Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- BRCA Testing in Prostate Cancer: A Histopathologist's Perspective.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to determine whether the presence of intraductal carcinoma of the prostate or invasive cribriform carcinoma correlates with homologous recombination repair or mismatch repair gene alterations in patients with prostate cancer who have not undergone prior systemic treatment. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe conducted a retrospective review of 347 systemic treatment-naïve prostate cancer patients who underwent genomic testing between January 2018 and May 2024 at a single tertiary center. Clinical and genomic characteristics were compared between groups with and without intraductal carcinoma of the prostate or invasive cribriform carcinoma. Predictive factors for homologous recombination repair gene mutations were identified through logistic regression.
resultsAmong the study population, 73.2% demonstrated intraductal or cribriform histologic features. Mutations in homologous recombination repair genes were detected in 24.8% of those with these features, and in 22.6% of those without. Mutations in mismatch repair genes occurred in 2.8% and 1.1% of the respective groups. No differences were observed in prostate-specific antigen levels, microsatellite instability, or tumor mutational burden. Logistic regression analysis identified Grade Groups (P < 0.001) and younger age at diagnosis (P = 0.041) as significant predictors of homologous recombination repair gene alterations. The presence of intraductal or cribriform patterns, however, did not predict such mutations (P = 0.827).
conclusionThe presence of intraductal carcinoma or cribriform growth patterns was not associated with increased likelihood of mutations in homologous recombination repair genes. These findings support the use of clinical parameters such as age and Grade Group, rather than histologic subtype alone, in guiding decisions for genetic testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.