ArticleBMC infectious diseases2025
Healthcare costs of invasive meningococcal disease: a nationwide population-based study using an innovative clustering method to identify sequelae.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Burden of Invasive Meningococcal Disease: Evolving Epidemiology and Implications for Prevention Policy.Infectious diseases and therapy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundStudies investigating the costs associated with invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) are scarce, primarily due to the disease rarity, its highly variable prognosis, and the potential for sequelae to develop long after the acute phase. We conducted a retrospective longitudinal cohort study to estimate the healthcare costs associated with IMD in France in the short (one month), medium (two years), and long (up to 12 years) term.
methodsUsing the National Health Data System (SNDS), we extracted data for all individuals hospitalised with a diagnosis of IMD (IMD+) between 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2018. Each IMD + individual was matched to up to four individuals without IMD. Among IMD + individuals discharged alive (exposed individuals), a K-modes clustering method using 64 healthcare resource utilisation (HCRU) variables to identify those with high HCRU levels (EIC+, for Exposed Individuals with Care), who served as a proxy for individuals with IMD sequelae. Additional costs associated with exposure were estimated using generalized estimating equations (GEEs). The cost analysis was conducted from the perspective of the National Health Insurance System.
resultsOf the 5,770 IMD + individuals (52.6% male; 29.7% aged < 5 years; 27.4% with comorbidities), 4,502 were exposed individuals (52.2% male; 30.9% aged < 5 years; 26.4% with comorbidities), of whom 1,032 were EIC+ (40.4% male; 7.9% aged < 5 years; 30.0% aged ≥ 65 years; 62.8% with comorbidities). The mean per capita costs of the index hospitalisation were €10,599 (SD: €16,931). These costs were €2,400 (SD: €10,565) in the short term (excluding the index hospitalisation), €9,304 (SD: €51,785) in the medium term, and €37,718 (SD: €114,143) in the long term. They were, respectively, 19.2 (aOR; 95%CI: 17.9–20.5), 1.3 (1.2–1.4), and 2.2 (2.0-2.5) times higher than those of the matched unexposed individuals. When the index hospitalisation was included, short-term costs were 86.3 (aOR; 95%CI: 81.2–91.7) times higher.
conclusionsThe healthcare costs associated with IMD extend well beyond hospital discharge. The long-term management of sequelae significantly increases the economic burden of the disease, emphasising the importance of effective preventive strategies for IMD. The clustering method used in this study could facilitate the identification of IMD sequelae in real-world data. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.