Observational studyBMC emergency medicine2025
Capillary refill time as a bedside perfusion indicator: associations with vital signs and triage acuity in the emergency department: a cross-sectional study.
Observational study in BMC emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07054151 (Clinical Predictors of Capillary Refill Time and Their Association With Triage Categories From the Emergency Department Perspective), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Clinical Predictors of Capillary Refill Time and Their Association With Triage Categories From the Emergency Department Perspective: A Cross-Sectional Study
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Assessment of the Microcirculation During Extracorporeal Blood Purification in Septic Patients: A Narrative Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe capillary refill time (CRT) is the time it takes for a capillary bed to regain its color after being subjected to pressure. Capillary refill time (CRT) is a bedside perfusion indicator. We examined CRT across emergency department (ED) triage categories and identified independent correlates of CRT and prolonged CRT (> 2 s).
methodsIn this cross-sectional study (July–September 2024), adults presenting to a tertiary ED were assigned green/yellow/red triage. CRT was measured in triplicate on the index-finger pulp after 10-s blanching and the mean was analyzed. Vital signs (SpO₂, heart rate, systolic/diastolic blood pressure, body temperature, skin temperature at the measurement site, and respiratory rate) were recorded. Associations were assessed using correlation and multivariable regression (overall and stratified by triage).
resultsWe included 313 patients (mean age 55.8 ± 20.9 years; 53.4% female). CRT repeatability was high (ICC = 0.972, 95% Cl). Mean CRT was 2.00 ± 0.94 s and was longer in the red vs. other triage groups (2.36 ± 1.01 s; p < 0.001). In stratified models, green: heart rate (β > 0, p = 0.031) and respiratory rate (β < 0, p < 0.001); yellow: age (β > 0, p = 0.001) and respiratory rate (β > 0, p = 0.039); red: age (β > 0, p = 0.001) and respiratory rate (β > 0, p = 0.026). In the overall model, age and heart rate were positively, and systolic blood pressure negatively, associated with CRT (all p < 0.05).
conclusionCRT varies with ED triage acuity and behaves as a rapid, reproducible bedside perfusion indicator. Age, heart rate, respiratory rate and systolic blood pressure are independent correlates of CRT, supporting its utility in initial assessment. Prospective, multicenter validation and prediction-model performance reporting (AUC, calibration) are warranted. CLINICAL
trial registrationThe present study has been registered with the Clinical Trials Protocol Registration and Results System (ClinicalTrials.gov) under the registration number NCT07054151. The registration date is 26/06/2025.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.