ArticleBMC anesthesiology2025
Correlation between corrected carotid flow time and ultrasonic inferior vena cava-collapsibility index in parturients with twin pregnancies undergoing cesarean section under spinal anesthesia.
Article in BMC anesthesiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo explore the correlation and consistency of carotid artery corrected flow time (cFT) combined with ultrasonic measurement of inferior vena cava collapsibility index (IVC-CI) in parturients with twin pregnancies undergoing cesarean section under spinal anesthesia.
methodsForty-seven twin pregnancies women undergoing elective cesarean section were selected. The ASA score was rated as II, aged from 18 to 45 years old. Spinal anesthesia was performed at L3-4. cFT and IVC-CI, general data (BMI, gestational weeks, operation duration, blood loss), MAP, temperature sensory block level and adverse reactions were recorded at baseline (T1) and completion of testing the level of spinal anesthesia (T2).
resultThe correlation coefficient analysis of baseline IVC-CI% and cFT revealed that the Pearson’s coefficient was 0.905, >0.4. Thus, pre-anesthesia IVC-CI% had a strong correlation with cFT, with R2 of 81.9%. The correlation coefficient analysis of post-anesthesia IVC-CI% and cFT revealed that Pearson’s coefficient was 0.924, > 0.4. Thus, post-anesthesia IVC-CI% had a strong correlation with cFT, with R2 of 85.4%.
conclusioncFT is strongly consistent with ultrasound measurement of IVC-CI in twin pregnancies, which can be used as a valuable index for predicting the volume in parturients with twin pregnancies undergoing cesarean section under spinal anesthesia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.