Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41214439›Full record

ArticleEcological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America2025

Divergent responses of native predators to severe wildfire and biological invasion are mediated by life history.

Joshua M Barry, Connor M Wood, Gavin M Jones, Kate A McGinn, Kevin G Kelly, H Anu Kramer, Daniel F Hofstadter, Stefan Kahl, Holger Klinck, Nicholas F Kryshak and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Divergent responses of native predators to severe wildfire and biological invasion are mediated by life history.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Joshua M BarryDepartment of Forest and Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Connor M WoodK. Lisa Yang Center for Conservation Bioacoustics, Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0235-5214
Gavin M JonesU.S. Forest Service - Rocky Mountain Research Station, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5102-1229
Kate A McGinnDepartment of Forest and Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4647-1847
Kevin G KellyDepartment of Forest and Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
H Anu KramerDepartment of Forest and Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2014-0070
Daniel F HofstadterDepartment of Forest and Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3742-3640
Stefan KahlK. Lisa Yang Center for Conservation Bioacoustics, Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.
Holger KlinckK. Lisa Yang Center for Conservation Bioacoustics, Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.
Nicholas F KryshakDepartment of Forest and Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Brian P DottersSierra Pacific Industries, Anderson, California, USA.
Kevin N RobertsSierra Pacific Industries, Anderson, California, USA.
John J KeaneUS Department of Agriculture (USDA) Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Placerville, California, USA.
Elizabeth NgDepartment of Forest and Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
M Zachariah PeeryDepartment of Forest and Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

Funding

Fish and Wildlife Service F23AC03051-00German Federal Ministry of Education and ResearchSierra Pacific IndustriesU.S. Forest Service 2017-CR-11052007-058Wisconsin Agricultural Experiment Station
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Anthropocene is defined by rapid environmental changes such as biological invasions and shifting disturbance regimes that threaten native species. Understanding the drivers of endangerment for species facing multiple simultaneous threats is challenging without experimental methods. Here, we examined the relative and combined effects of severe wildfires and an early-stage barred owl (Strix varia) invasion on an assemblage of three native forest owl species in the Sierra Nevada, California, USA, leveraging manipulative (lethal barred owl removals) and natural (severe wildfires) experiments and a regional passive acoustic monitoring program from 2018 to 2023. Wildfires reduced flammulated owl (Psiloscops flammeolus) occupancy by 71% in severely burned areas (sites experiencing near-complete high-severity fire) for at least 3 years postfire but did not affect great horned (Bubo virginianus) or northern pygmy owl (Glaucidium californicum) occupancy. Because flammulated owls have small home ranges and an insectivorous diet that depends on nearby mature forest foraging habitat and secondary-cavity nest sites, they showed a strong negative response to extensive high-severity burn areas that eliminate these resources. Flammulated owl occupancy increased approximately twofold from 0.09 (85% CI: 0.03, 0.20) to 0.18 (85% CI: 0.07, 0.36) following lethal barred owl removals (with only 4% posterior distribution overlap), but removals did not affect the other two native species. Despite evidence of habitat segregation between barred owls and the native species, where barred owls typically occupied intermediate-to-late seral forests in flatter, lower elevation areas, this niche partitioning was insufficient to prevent nonconsumptive or predatory effects on flammulated owls. In contrast, the resilience of great horned and pygmy owls may have stemmed from their larger body size and diurnal activity, respectively, suggesting that life history mediates forest owl vulnerability to invasive barred owls. The negative effects of barred owls on flammulated owls, even during the early invasion stage, coupled with well-documented effects on other small, nocturnal forest owl species in regions with high barred owl densities, reinforce the conservation value of proactive invasive species management. Our study demonstrates the power of regional-scale experimentation, facilitated by bioacoustic monitoring, for understanding biological community responses-mediated by species' life history-to rapid environmental changes.

Indexed as

Introduced SpeciesLife History TraitsPredatory BehaviorStrigiformesWildfiresAnimalsCaliforniaForestsbarred owlbioacousticsdisturbanceinvasive speciesSierra Nevadasite occupancyStrigidaewildfire

Identifiers

PMID41214439
PMCPMC12602772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.