ReviewNeuropsychology review2025
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Impact of Cocaine Use on Cognitive Inhibition.
Review in Neuropsychology review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Evidence exists that cocaine impacts cognition and behaviour. Yet, uncertainty remains as to what extent cognitive inhibition efficiency decreases in cocaine users. We carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis following the PRISMA 2020 checklist. Our search yielded 1725 articles from Scopus, PubMed and WOS, from which twenty-four studies were finally identified as meeting the inclusion criteria for the systematic review and twenty (providing twenty-three effect sizes) for the meta-analysis. A multi-level random-effects meta-analysis was conducted, and moderation analysis was implemented to examine the potential moderating effects of sex, age, years of regular cocaine use, days of cocaine abstinence, and sample type (clinical vs. community) in the estimated effects. Results showed worse inhibition in cocaine users compared to controls (g = 0.65; 95% CI [0.28, 1.03], p < .001), but none of the moderators significantly impacted this effect. Findings highlight the link between impaired cognitive inhibition and cocaine use disorder and suggest that inhibitory control training approaches would be promising. Future clinical studies are needed to elucidate on the efficacy of neuropsychological approaches for improving inhibitory control and augment the effectiveness of first-line interventions for cocaine use disorder.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41214400What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.