ArticleNeuroinformatics2025
RELICT-NI: Replica Detection in Synthetic Neuroimaging-A Study on Noncontrast CT and Time-of-Flight MRA.
Article in Neuroinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSynthetic neuroimaging data has the potential to augment and improve the generalizability of deep learning models. However, memorization in generative models can lead to unintended leakage of sensitive patient information, limiting model utility and jeopardizing patient privacy.
methodsWe propose RELICT-NI (REpLIca deteCTion-NeuroImaging), a framework for detecting replicas in synthetic neuroimaging datasets. RELICT-NI evaluates image similarity using three complementary approaches: (1) image-level analysis, (2) feature-level analysis via a pretrained medical foundation model, and (3) segmentation-level analysis. RELICT-NI was validated on two clinically relevant neuroimaging use cases: non-contrast head CT with intracerebral hemorrhage (N = 774) and time-of-flight MR angiography of the Circle of Willis (N = 1,782). Expert visual scoring was used as the reference for identifying replicas. Balanced accuracy at the optimal threshold was reported to assess replica classification performance of each method.
resultsThe reference visual rating identified 45 of 50 and 5 of 50 generated images as replicas for the NCCT and TOF-MRA use cases, respectively. For the NCCT use case, both image-level and feature-level analyses achieved perfect replica detection (balanced accuracy = 1) at optimal thresholds. A perfect classification of replicas for the TOF-MRA case was not possible at any threshold, with the segmentation-level analysis achieving the highest balanced accuracy (0.79).
conclusionsReplica detection is a crucial but often neglected validation step in developing deep generative models in neuroimaging. The proposed RELICT-NI framework provides a standardized, easy-to-use tool for replica detection and aims to facilitate responsible and ethical synthesis of neuroimaging data. RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Our developed replica detection framework provides an important step towards standardized and rigorous validation practices of generative models in neuroimaging. Our method promotes the secure sharing of neuroimaging data and facilitates the development of robust deep learning models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.