ArticleAnnals of hematology2025
Splenectomy does not improve survival in chronic active Epstein-Barr virus disease patients.
Article in Annals of hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We aimed to evaluate the clinical value of splenectomy as a treatment for Chronic active Epstein-Barr virus disease (CAEBVD). We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data from clinical records of patients received splenectomy in our institution from October 1, 2014, to October 1, 2024. The splenectomy cohort (n = 16) was matched to non-splenectomy controls (n = 32) at a 1:2 ratio using propensity scores derived from gender, age, baseline EBV-DNA copies, whether with HLH, and whether received Allo-HSCT. A total of 48 CAEBVD patients were enrolled in this study. Splenectomy cannot minimize the EBV-DNA copies in peripheral blood. The median OS of patients who received splenectomy was 86 months, while that of patients without splenectomy was 23 months. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.189). When patients experienced recurrence-related death, no significant difference in survival time was observed between the two groups (P = 0.607). In the CAEBVD with HLH subgroup, there was no significant difference in survival times between patients with and without splenectomy (P = 0.423). A total of 18 patients received Allo-HSCT. The time to WBC and PLT engraftment between the non-splenectomy group and splenectomy group showed no significant difference (P = 0.788, P = 0.407). Splenectomy demonstrated no significant benefit in reducing EBV copies and symptom relief, and suggests splenectomy fails to prolong patient survival supporting its limited role in CAEBVD management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.