Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41214338›Full record

ReviewRadiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2025

[Childhood interstitial lung disease].

Stephanie Spieth, Gabriele Hahn

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Stephanie SpiethInstitut und Poliklinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland. stephanie.spieth@ukdd.de.
Gabriele HahnPädiatrische Radiologie, Universitäts-Kinderspital beider Basel, Basel, Schweiz.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

clinical issueChildren's interstitial lung disease (chILD) encompasses a large group of rare and heterogeneous pulmonary disorders associated with diagnostic challenges for all disciplines. Due to the substantial morbidity and mortality, a timely and accurate diagnosis is required for optimal patient care. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL

methodsRadiology plays a crucial role in the diagnosis of chILD; computed tomography (CT) represents the current gold standard imaging modality. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: To make an accurate diagnosis, a systematic approach in a multidisciplinary team is essential. CT confirms the presence of chILD and enables exclusion of more frequent disorders. In conjunction with patient history and clinical presentation, knowledge of imaging patterns in chILD may lead to a specific diagnosis; otherwise unspecific changes can narrow differential diagnosis, guide further diagnostics, and prevent more invasive procedures.

Indexed as

Lung Diseases, InterstitialTomography, X-Ray ComputedChildDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansLungClassificationComputed tomographyPaediatric pneumologyPediatric radiologySurfactant dysfunction

Identifiers

PMID41214338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.