ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2026
Three-Dimensional Concept in Simultaneous Periareolar Augmentation-Mastopexy.
Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBreast ptosis commonly arises from tissue laxity associated with aging, weight fluctuations, pregnancy, or lactation, often accompanied by upper-pole volume depletion. Post-lactational atrophy further exacerbates ptosis, causing physical and psychological distress. Traditional mastopexy techniques typically focus on vertical tightening and may insufficiently address horizontal glandular laxity. This study evaluates a three-dimensional (3D) conceptual approach for simultaneous augmentation-mastopexy via a circumareolar incision, aiming to correct mild-to-moderate breast ptosis and restore optimal breast contour.
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 51 female patients (102 breasts; mean age 32.52 ± 4.62 years) with mild-to-moderate breast ptosis who underwent single-stage augmentation-mastopexy using our 3D conceptual technique. The surgical design featured a circumareolar incision, limited glandular tissue excision at the upper pole, and dual-plane implant placement. Perioperative data, including ptosis grade, operative time, implant size, and short-term complications, were meticulously recorded. Patient satisfaction was assessed via a Likert scale (0 = poor, 10 = very satisfied), and mean follow-up was 6.96 ± 2.96 months.
resultsPreoperatively, 78.43% of breasts had Grade II ptosis, and 21.57% had Grade I ptosis. The mean nipple-to-midclavicular distance decreased significantly from 24.22 ± 1.55 cm to 19.18 ± 0.78 cm, yielding a mean nipple position change of 4.71 ± 1.02 cm. The mean implant volume was 267.63 ± 38.50 mL, and the mean operative time was 143.73 ± 16.43 minutes. Scarring was minimal around the areola, and periareolar wrinkles typically resolved within 3-6 months. The overall complication rate was 5.88%, with no capsular contracture or NAC necrosis reported. Patient satisfaction was high (8.94 ± 0.83), and NAC sensation was preserved in all cases.
conclusionsThe 3D conceptual augmentation-mastopexy via a circumareolar incision offers a comprehensive solution for mild-to-moderate breast ptosis. By integrating limited glandular resection with vertical and horizontal tightening, this technique restores breast contour, preserves NAC sensitivity, and achieves high patient satisfaction with minimal scarring. Post-lactational breast atrophy and accompanying ptosis can thus be effectively managed using this approach, relieving both physical and psychological burdens. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: The journal asks authors to assign a level of evidence to each article. For a complete description of Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, see the Table of Contents or the online Instructions for Authors at www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
41214322What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.