ArticleIntegrative psychological & behavioral science2025
Windows of (Dis) Trust: A Situated Psychological Perspective on Understanding the Phenomenon of Trust.
Article in Integrative psychological & behavioral science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Based on the Danish philosopher Knud Ejlar Løgstrup's understanding of trust as a spontaneous and sovereign expression of life, we argue that trust is a radically relational phenomenon that manifests itself in a situated manner between people. Distrust arises when our trust is betrayed, either because the other does not live up to our expectations or in some other way raises suspicion that trust may potentially be betrayed. Distrust is thus the negation of trust and requires justification. We argue that trust and distrust are fundamentally different phenomena yet dialectically intertwined. We further argue that both can only be understood relationally and situationally, and thus not as something we carry with us as stable or uniform structures. We analyze examples from the relationship between parents and daycare-professionals, with a particular focus on the windows of daycare centers. Through this, we argue that it is necessary to incorporate a social practice theoretical framework to capture the conditions we have for safeguarding trust and understanding the reasons of why distrust arises. We conclude that Løgstrup's phenomenological understanding and social practice theory are not immediately commensurable, but both are necessary to develop a comprehensive situated psychological understanding of the phenomenon of trust.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.