Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41214291›Full record

ReviewPediatric research2026

Diastolic function in newborn infants: understanding pathophysiology, diagnosis and clinical relevance.

Koert de Waal, Irina Prelipcean, Neil Patel

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Koert de WaalJohn Hunter Children's Hospital Department of Neonatology and University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia. koert.dewaal@health.nsw.gov.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1084-1482
Irina PrelipceanUniversity of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA.
Neil PatelRoyal Hospital for Children, Department of neonatology, Glasgow, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diastolic function, the combined effect of myocardial relaxation, recoil forces, stiffness and atrial function, describes the ability of the ventricle to fill up with blood and prepare a stroke volume for ejection. Diastolic dysfunction (DD), also described as 'an increased resistance to filling' for example due to impaired relaxation, chamber stiffness, volume load or pericardial restraint, is a situation whereby normal filling is only achieved with elevated filling pressure and higher atrial pressure. Diastolic dysfunction can progress to diastolic heart failure, a clinical syndrome with respiratory deterioration and/or edema and is associated with morbidity and mortality. Diastolic dysfunction can be diagnosed with a multi-modal multi-parameter echocardiography approach, but further development of newborn specific diagnostic algorithms is required. Diastolic dysfunction often precedes systolic dysfunction and thus provides an opportunity for management directives in newborns at high risk of heart failure: with a patent ductus arteriosus, septic shock, pulmonary hypertension, congenital diaphragmatic hernia, small for gestational age infants and infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia. This review describes the current understanding of the physiology and pathophysiology of diastolic function in newborn infants. IMPACT: Diastolic dysfunction is common in the neonatal intensive care and can lead to diastolic heart failure. Understanding pathophysiology and clinical relevance allows for targeted treatments and supportive care. Improved cardiovascular care during a crucial part of development can improve short- and long-term outcomes and limit early heart failure.

Indexed as

DiastoleEchocardiographyHeart Failure, DiastolicHumansInfant, NewbornStroke Volume

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.