ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2026
A Simplified Classification System for In-Transit Melanoma Metastases.
Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- ASO Author Reflections: A Simplified Classification System for In-Transit Melanoma Metastases.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn-transit metastases (ITMs) are challenging to treat because of their heterogenous disease course and chronic, relapsing-remitting nature. Specific factors associated with worse prognosis are poorly understood and not included in current American Joint Committee on Cancer classifications. An ITMs-specific classification system to aid treatment decisions and clinical trial design is lacking.
methodsThis study involved 142 patients (M 44%, F 56%; median age 70 years [interquartile range 62-77]) with ITMs from a single, cutaneous melanoma. Baseline melanoma and ITMs characteristics, disease progression, and survival outcomes were collected from a prospective database. The primary outcome was disease-specific survival (DSS). A subgroup analysis excluding stage IV disease at diagnosis was performed.
resultsA longer ITMs-free interval was associated with a longer DSS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.98-1.00; p = 0.027). A higher number of ITMs and greater Breslow thickness was associated with a shorter DSS (HR 1.25; 95% CI 1.04-1.51; p = 0.020 and HR 1.10; 95% CI 1.04-1.17; p = 0.001). No independent predictors of DSS were identified. On multivariable analysis, larger ITMs and synchronous regional disease correlated with a worse distant metastasis-free survival (HR 1.02; 95% CI 1.03-1.31; p = 0.015 and HR 2.61; 95% CI 1.44-4.72; p = 0.002). Maximum threshold analysis selected the optimal cut-point for continuous variables: two lesions for number of ITMs and 30 mm for size at initial diagnosis, 2 mm for primary melanoma Breslow thickness, and 20 months for ITMs-free interval (time from primary melanoma diagnosis to ITMs onset), adjusted to 18 months for clinical relevance.
conclusionPatients presenting with more than two and/or >30 mm ITMs at first diagnosis, short ITM-free interval (≤18 months), and synchronous regional disease should be considered at higher risk for disease progression and death.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.