Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41214255›Full record

ArticleAIDS and behavior2026

Estimating Prevention-Effective Adherence to HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Among Australian Gay, Bisexual and Queer Men and Non-binary People: A Mixed-Methods Analysis.

James MacGibbon, Anthony K J Smith, Timothy R Broady, Sarah K Calabrese, Jeanne Ellard, Dean Murphy, Tina Gordon, Simin Yu, James Gray, John de Wit and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS and behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

James MacGibbonCentre for Social Research in Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. j.macgibbon@unsw.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1359-9572
Anthony K J SmithCentre for Social Research in Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0005-9542
Timothy R BroadyCentre for Social Research in Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4341-1868
Sarah K CalabreseDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2640-0208
Jeanne EllardAustralian Research Centre in Sex, Health & Society, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
Dean MurphyAustralian Research Centre in Sex, Health & Society, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2752-7091
Tina GordonNew South Wales Ministry of Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Simin YuCentre for Social Research in Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2910-8712
James GrayHealth Equity Matters, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
John de WitDepartment of Interdisciplinary Social Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5895-7935
Martin HoltCentre for Social Research in Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2586-8274
Benjamin R BavintonKirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5834-8278

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oral HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is highly effective when taken appropriately at times of HIV risk, termed "prevention-effective adherence". To understand suboptimal adherence, we refined a brief measure for surveys among gay, bisexual and queer men and non-binary (GBQ+) people. We used a mixed-methods design, comprising a national, online cross-sectional survey (June-July 2023) and cognitive interviews (August-October 2023). Logistic regression identified characteristics of PrEP users who reported condomless anal intercourse with casual partners (CLAIC) that was not protected by their own PrEP use because they missed PrEP doses ("PrEP-unprotected CLAIC"). Cognitive interviews investigated whether the prevention-effective adherence measure was comprehensible. Of 2,046 survey respondents, 792 current PrEP users who had CLAIC in the past 6 months were included (Median age = 37, 86.7% gay, 34.5% non-daily-PrEP users). Of PrEP users who reported any CLAIC, 194 (24.5%) reported any PrEP-unprotected CLAIC. They were more likely to: be < 30 years old, be born in Asia vs. Australia, be part-time vs. full-time employed, use non-daily PrEP, have recently initiated PrEP, have experienced side effects from PrEP, and report recent sexualized drug use. They were less likely to find it easy to get PrEP. The 14 interviewees asked about the survey items (Mean age = 33; 50% gay; ) were able to answer the questions and reliably interpret the content. This first national estimate of prevention-effective adherence found that 24.5% of PrEP users who had CLAIC reported any PrEP-unprotected CLAIC. Targeted interventions in subgroups with more frequent PrEP-unprotected episodes must address side effects and other adherence barriers.

Indexed as

Anti-HIV AgentsHIV InfectionsHomosexuality, MaleMedication AdherencePre-Exposure ProphylaxisSexual and Gender MinoritiesAdultAustraliaBisexualityCross-Sectional StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedSexual PartnersSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultAnti-HIV AgentsAttitudesAustraliaGay and bisexual men (GBM)HIV preventionMen who have sex with men (MSM)PrEP adherencePrevention-effective adherence

Identifiers

PMID41214255
PMCPMC13076362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.