Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41214244›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026

GFANet: Global Feature Attention Network for Polyp Segmentation.

Leping Lin, Wenjie Huang, Ning Ouyang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Leping LinSchool of Information and Communication, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin, 541004, China.
Wenjie HuangSchool of Information and Communication, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin, 541004, China.
Ning OuyangSchool of Information and Communication, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin, 541004, China. ouyangning@guet.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1667-0028

Funding

Fund of Guangxi Key Laboratory of Wireless Wideband Communication and Signal Processing GXKL06200114Innovation Project of Guangxi Graduate Education YCSW2024316National Natural Science Foundation of China 62177012
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal polyps are early indicators of colorectal cancer, and their accurate segmentation holds significant clinical value for assisting diagnosis and treatment. However, the automatic segmentation of polyps remains a considerable challenge owing to their high variability in polyp size, shape, and color, along with the indistinct boundaries between polyps and surrounding mucosal tissues. Although existing deep learning-based methods have shown encouraging results in addressing these problems, they still encounter the following challenges: (1) the lack of incorporation of geometric orientation information restricts the model's understanding of structural features; (2) the models show low sensitivity to small polyps, often resulting in missed detections; and (3) insufficient multi-scale information fusion affects both the completeness and accuracy of segmentation. To address these challenges, we introduce a global feature attention network (GFANet), which integrates three innovative modules: the global feature direction encoder (GFDE), the feature attention module (FAM), and the multi-scale information aggregation (MIA) module. Specifically, GFDE captures global context from both vertical and horizontal directions, greatly enhancing the model's ability to localize polyps with blurred boundaries or camouflage-like appearance. FAM enhances feature representation within polyp regions while suppressing background noise. MIA progressively aggregates features across multiple scales and semantic levels, boosting the segmentation accuracy for polyps of various sizes. In our experiments, we conducted a systematic comparison between GFANet and ten state-of-the-art polyp segmentation networks. The results demonstrate that GFANet achieved superior performance across five publicly available datasets. On the CVC-300 dataset, the model achieved 90.2% mean dice coefficient (mDice) and 83.5% mean intersection over union (mIoU), representing the best results among all competing approaches. Furthermore, on the ETIS-LaribPolypDB dataset, GFANet outperformed the classical model PraNet by as much as 17.2% in terms of mDice, highlighting its strong cross-dataset generalization capability.

Indexed as

Colonic PolypsColorectal NeoplasmsDeep LearningImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedAlgorithmsHumansFeature attention,Global feature direction,Multi-scale information aggregationPolyp segmentation

Identifiers

PMID41214244
PMCPMC13481947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.