ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
Segmentation and Clustering Analysis of Scanned Foot Models for Intelligent Diabetic Foot Ulcer Offloading Boots.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is a common and severe complication of diabetes that leads to amputation if not effectively managed. Intelligent offloading or rehabilitation devices or boots are used to manage or observe the ulcer and the process of treatment which requires the segmentation and clustering analysis of 3D scanned foot models. This study examines the effectiveness of two widely used clustering algorithms, K-Means and Gaussian Mixture Models (GMM), in segmenting scanned foot models to use in rehabilitation boots. The performance of K-Means and GMM was compared across 98 foot models. GMM consistently achieved higher silhouette scores (0.58 vs. 0.42 for K = 5), lower Davies-Bouldin scores (0.47 vs. 0.54 for K = 5), and more stable clustering across anatomical sections, despite requiring almost 20% more computation time. These results highlight GMM's superior ability to capture the complex nonlinear structures of diabetic feet, with implications for more precise and personalized offloading boot design. Precise segmentation of scanned foot models is a crucial step in various anatomical and medical applications, such as the design of custom orthotic devices, rehabilitation offloading boots, and the analysis of foot biomechanics-particularly useful within DFU management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.