ArticleScientific reports2025
Application of stacked bidirectional LSTM neural networks in reservoir porosity prediction.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Porosity directly affects the fluid storage and transportation capacity of reservoirs, and is an important parameter for portraying the physical properties of oil and gas reservoirs. However, existing porosity prediction methods have obvious limitations. Traditional petrophysical modeling and cross-plot method struggle to characterize nonlinear relationships under complex geological conditions. Machine learning methods such as support vector machines (SVM) and BP neural networks rely on manual feature extraction, resulting in limited generalization ability. These methods show significant accuracy degradation in noisy data, with insufficient noise immunity. For this reason, this study uses petrophysical modeling to generate large-scale and diverse synthetic data sets of elastic and anisotropic parameters based on field logging data. And an enhanced stacked bi-directional long short-term memory (S-BiLSTM) model is proposed, which uses stacking of bi-directional LSTM layers to enhance feature extraction and prediction capabilities. Validation is carried out using seismic field-measured data from an oil field in southwest China, and the results show that the method has high accuracy and robustness in porosity distribution prediction. Specifically, the prediction accuracy of the S-BiLSTM model reaches 92.19%, which is 7.81% higher than that of the LSTM model and 14.06% higher than that of the RNN model. It also performs well under noisy data. At a signal-to-noise ratio of 10dB its accuracy is 82.81% surpassing RNN at 59.38% and LSTM at 68.75%. When the signal-to-noise ratio drops to 1dB its accuracy remains 76.12% significantly higher than RNN at 44.81% and LSTM at 53.5%. This study explores the potential of deep learning in the prediction of reservoir physical properties parameters, which has certain application value for oil and gas exploration and development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.