Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41214170›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Sensitivity analysis of data augmentation methods on performance of deep learning model for lung sounds classification.

Zhaoping Wang, Yingcui Wang, Zhiqiang Sun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zhaoping WangDepartment of Emergency, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University(Qingdao), Qingdao, China.
Yingcui WangDepartment of Cardiology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University(Qingdao), Qingdao, China. 199462000803@email.sdu.edu.cn.
Zhiqiang SunSchool of Automation, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.

Funding

People's Livelihood Science and Technology Project of Qingdao 22-3-7-smij-6-nshQingdao Key Clinical Specialty Elite Discipline QDZDZK-2022008Qingdao medical excellence discipline leader QDYXDTR-2022054Qingdao Science and Technology Project 25-1-5-smjk-9-nsh
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physicians can distinguish between abnormal and normal lung conditions more easily with the help of an AI stethoscope. A well-trained deep learning model (DLM) for lung sounds classification is the core of an AI stethoscope. Some publicly accessible lung sound datasets suffer from inefficient data and/or imbalanced class distribution. And then the DLM based on them may be less generalized and overfitted. So, the datasets must be augmented to correct the imbalance. Some data augmentation (DA) methods for audio signals have been presented and applied to sound event classification or speech recognition. We selected seven popular DA methods and tried to explore the effects on lung sounds classification experimentally. The VGG-11 was chosen as the baseline model and ICBHI 2017 as the dataset. And the lung sound signals were transformed to mel-spectrograms as the training and test samples for VGG-11. The results showed that three spectrogram-like methods of Spectrogram flipping, mix-up and SpecMix performed better relatively, either at training or test phase. SpecMix achieved a percentage of F1_score as high as 78.6% at training phase, and Spectrogram flipping achieved the score as 75.4% at test phase. The ResNet-18 was selected as another baseline model to eliminate model bias, and the results showed that the sensitivities still held across models.

Indexed as

Deep LearningLungRespiratory SoundsClassification AlgorithmsConvolutional Neural NetworksHumansSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedSound SpectrographyConvolutional neural networkLung sounds classificationMel-spectrogramSensitivity analysisVGG

Identifiers

PMID41214170
PMCPMC12603304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.