Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41214104›Full record

Observational studyScientific reports2025

Machine learning models for predicting short-term progression in patients with stage 4 chronic kidney disease: a multi-center validation study.

Jingshu Li, Xuanyi Du, Rui Zhang, Xue Li, Jinyuan Xu, Xiangnan Song, Yisha Zhao, Li Liu, Guangyan Xu, Yuying Fan

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jingshu LiHemodialysis Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Xuanyi DuDepartment of Nephrology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Rui ZhangHemodialysis Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Xue LiDepartment of Clinical Nursing Teaching, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Jinyuan XuCollege of Bioinformatics Science and Technology, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Xiangnan SongDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Yisha ZhaoDepartment of Cardiac Care Unit, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Li LiuDepartment of Nephrology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Guangyan XuHemodialysis Center, Harbin 242 Hospital of Genertec Medical, Harbin, China.
Yuying FanDepartment of Clinical Nursing Teaching, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China. fanfanfensituan@126.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

End-stage renal disease (ESRD) is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Identifying patients with stage 4 chronic kidney disease (CKD) at risk of short-term progression to ESRD remains challenging. Accurate prediction can improve advanced care planning and patient outcomes. This study aimed to develop and validate a machine learning (ML) model for predicting progression within 25 weeks (approximately six months) of ESRD in patients with stage 4 CKD. Electronic health records (EHRs) of patients with stage 4 CKD were analyzed. Nine ML models including Ridge regression (Ridge), random forest (RF), and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) were used to predict short-term progression to ESRD within 25 weeks. The models were trained and externally validated using the data of 346 and 105 patients. Of the 451 patients with stage 4 CKD, 219 developed ESRD. Among the evaluated models, XGBoost demonstrated the best overall performance. In the internal validation, it achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.93, an accuracy of 0.90, and an F1 score of 0.89. In the external validation, XGBoost maintained the highest AUC (0.85), accuracy (0.79), and F1 score (0.79), along with the highest average precision (0.89) and a low log-loss (0.48), indicating strong discriminative ability and good generalizability. The top predictive features included high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, Alb, Cys C, ApoB, FGB, Bun, Neutrophil, and Total cholesterol. This study demonstrated the feasibility of ML for assessing ESRD prognosis based on easily accessible clinical features. XGBoost demonstrated superior performance in both internal and external validation, suggesting its potential for future patient screening.

Indexed as

Kidney Failure, ChronicMachine LearningRenal Insufficiency, ChronicAdultAgedDisease ProgressionElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisEnd stage renal diseaseMachine learningPrognosisRisk prediction modelShort-term progressionStage 4 CKD

Identifiers

PMID41214104
PMCPMC12603016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.