ArticleScientific reports2025
Code vulnerability detection based on augmented program dependency graph and optimized CodeBERT.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- GFTrans: an on-the-fly static analysis framework for code performance profiling.Frontiers in big data · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The increasing complexity of software systems has rendered code vulnerability detection a critical aspect of software security. While deep learning-based approaches have advanced this field, challenges such as coarse-grained function-level detection, scalability limitations, and constrained accuracy persist. Although slice-level detection effectively reduces noise, it frequently sacrifices essential syntactic and semantic information, which undermines vulnerability representation, elevates false positive rates, and ultimately limits practical applicability. To address these challenges, this paper proposes a code vulnerability detection method based on an augmented program dependency graph and optimized CodeBERT. The method augments the traditional program dependency graph by extending its structure to capture richer semantic and structural information in the code. Furthermore, it employs the Code Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (CodeBERT) pretrained model for extracting code embedding features. Additionally, a hybrid loss function optimization strategy tailored for CodeBERT is proposed to address the long-tail distribution characteristics of code vulnerability detection. The experimental results demonstrate that, compared to other state-of-the-art classical methods, the detection accuracy and F1 score on synthetic and real-world datasets have been improved by an average of up to 8.34% and 29.71%, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.