ArticleScientific reports2025
Automated rhinoceros detection in satellite imagery using deep learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- From pixels to conservation: Deep learning for automated monitoring of rare and endangered wildlife.iScience · 2026Article
- Improving wildlife track classification through human-in-the-loop method and explainable AI.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rhinoceroses face severe threats from poaching, habitat fragmentation, and ongoing habitat degradation. Monitoring rhinoceros across the vast, often inaccessible landscapes they inhabit is challenging. In this study, we assess the feasibility of detecting white rhinoceroses using very high-resolution (33-36 cm) satellite imagery acquired over the world's largest private rhinoceros reserve in South Africa using a YOLO-based object detection model (YOLOv12x). We test whether synthetic imagery enhances model performance, whether rhinoceroses can be reliably distinguished from elephants in satellite imagery, and whether synthetically generated rhinoceroses are visually distinguishable from real ones by human annotators. We achieve an average precision (AP) of 0.65 in detection accuracy with synthetic augmentation yielding a marginal improvement. This study provides a demonstration of monitoring rhinos using this approach and introduces an open-access dataset to support the development and testing of new models. The aim is to facilitate effective monitoring of rhinos across the vast landscapes they inhabit. Developing new detection techniques can strengthen conservation and recovery initiatives, including translocations, assessment of breeding program success, and evaluation of anti-poaching efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.