ArticleScientific reports2025
Exploring sex differences in myocardial fibrosis in patients with structurally normal hearts.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sex and Age Differences in Procedural and Medium-Term Electrical Performance Outcomes of Dual-Chamber Leadless Pacemakers.Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology · 2026Article
- Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction in Women: Sex-Specific Insights Across the Continuum from Diagnosis to Outcomes.Current cardiology reports · 2026Review
- Small Hearts, Big Clues: A Narrative Review on Sex-Related Disparities in the Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Amyloidosis in Women.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Sex-Related Differences in Myocardial Deformation and Systolic Function in Healthy Individuals: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Global Longitudinal Strain and Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Sex-specific associations of physical frailty with cardiac structure and function: a cross-sectional study based on UK Biobank.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Myocardial fibrosis as evaluated by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) plays a central role in pathophysiology of cardiovascular diseases and exhibits sex-specific differences. The goal of our study was to assess sex-related differences in fibrosis in patients with structurally normal hearts. We retrospectively studied patients undergoing clinical CMR at 1.5T with preserved cardiac function and no structural abnormalities. Standardized CMR protocols included cine imaging, T1 mapping, and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) imaging. LGE presence, extent, and pattern, and extracellular volume fraction (ECV) were evaluated according to sex. The primary outcomes were all cause mortality and new-onset heart failure. Of 525 patients studied (43.1 ± 14.2 years, 69.5% female), 258 (49.1%) exhibited nonischemic LGE. Nonischemic LGE was more common in males (61.3% vs. 43.8%, p < 0.001), and remained so in multivariable analysis after adjustment for clinical covariates (OR 2.2, CI 1.17-4.13, p = 0.015). Women had higher ECV values (26.5 ± 4.3% vs. 23.2 ± 3.7, p < 0.001), and these sex differences remained significant in multivariable analysis (β coefficient = 1.29, p = 0.02). During 5.8 years follow-up there was no association between primary outcomes and nonischemic LGE. There was a trend towards association between ECV increase and all-cause mortality. The optimal ECV cutoff for all-cause mortality was 31.3% for females and 27.5% for males. Among patients with structurally normal hearts with preserved systolic function referred for clinical CMR exams, nonischemic LGE is more frequently observed in males, whereas ECV values are higher in females. ECV increase may be associated with all-cause mortality, both in female and male cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.