Trial reportScientific reports2025
sFlt-1/PlGF ratio use does not reduce hospitalisation duration in suspected preeclampsia: the PRECOG study, a multicentre randomised trial.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of the PRECOG study was to evaluate if the use of the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio in patients hospitalized for suspected preeclampsia before 35 weeks could improve patient management and reduce the length of hospitalization. A prospective randomized multicenter interventional open-label study in a hospital population with 2 parallel groups with or without taking into account the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio for the management of patients admitted for suspected pre-eclampsia. 80 patients were included in the study. Characteristics of patients were equally distributed among randomization groups. There was no difference in the primary outcome between the two groups. Hospitalization for more than 24 h was 75% in the group reveal versus 80% in the group conceal (Relative Risk p = 0.59). Groups did not differ in hospitalization duration for different cut-off values such. When stratifying by ratio value, among those with a ratio < 38, 37% were discharged home < 24 h in the conceal group and 47% in the reveal group. There was no difference in the secondary outcomes between the two groups. In this randomized controlled trial in women hospitalized for suspected of preeclampsia, the use of the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio at was not associated with a benefit in terms of duration of hospitalization or in maternal and neonatal outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.