ArticleScientific reports2025
Identification and cause analysis on unplanned reoperations by text classification approach.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Incidence and predictors of early and late reoperation after primary lumbar spine fusion: a 10-year retrospective cohort study of 1,356 patients.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Article
- Safety and Efficiency of Various Pancreatic Enucleation Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Unplanned reoperations (URs) not only increase the hospitalization period and healthcare cost, but also raise the death risk of patients. The analysis of URs is thus significant for their quality control and reduction. However, the massive text data generated in hospitals makes the identification of URs a tedious task with potential bias. Current research on UR is limited to data analysis and lack automated classification using deep learning and natural language processing. Here we propose the UR-Net framework. It implements the UR identification and cause analysis by processing the long texts of ward round documentation and applying few-shot learning on multi-class cause classification. Our framework consists of the URNet-XL with a batch fusion method based on XLNet model, and the URNet-GT for cause classification based on the pre-trained model combined with feature extraction modules of multi-head attention and a bi-directional Gated Recurrent Unit. High weighted F1 scores of 96.34% and 93.37% are obtained for the respective processes in comparison with the baseline methods. The Area Under receiver operating characteristic Curve (AUC) of 97.86% indicates an excellent UR classification on the unbalanced dataset. Our approach provides a new route of UR identification and analysis with the potential of reducing its occurrence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.