ArticleScientific reports2025
Automated lumbar spine segmentation in MRI using an enhanced U-Net with inception module and dual-output mechanism.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- 3D U-net for volumetric segmentation of spinal cord MRI in degenerative disorders.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Article
- Application of Statistical Shape Models to Standard Lumbar MRI for Stenosis Treatment Stratification: Severe Versus Normal Stenosis.JOR spine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate segmentation of spinal structures, including vertebrae, intervertebral discs (IVDs), and the spinal canal, is crucial for diagnosing lumbar spine disorders. Deep learning-based semantic segmentation has significantly improved accuracy in medical imaging. This study proposes an enhanced U-Net incorporating an Inception module for multi-scale feature extraction and a dual-output mechanism for improved training stability and feature refinement. The model is trained on the SPIDER lumbar spine MRI dataset and evaluated using Accuracy, Precision, Recall, F1-score, and mean Intersection over Union (mIoU). Comparative analysis with the baseline models-U-Net, ResUNet, Attention U-Net, and TransUNet-shows that the proposed model achieves superior segmentation accuracy, with improved boundary delineation and better handling of class imbalance. An evaluation of loss functions identified Dice loss as the most effective, enabling the model to achieve an mIoU of 0.8974, an accuracy of 0.9742, a precision of 0.9417, a recall of 0.9470, and an F1-score of 0.9444, outperforming all four baseline models. The Inception module enhances feature extraction at multiple scales, while the dual-output mechanism improves gradient flow and segmentation consistency. Initially focused on binary segmentation, the approach was extended to multiclass segmentation, enabling separate identification of vertebrae, IVDs, and the spinal canal. These enhancements offer a more precise and efficient solution for automated lumbar spine segmentation in MRI, thereby supporting enhanced diagnostic workflows in medical imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.