ArticleScientific reports2025
Mechanical, microstructure, durability, and economic assessment of nano titanium dioxide integrated concrete.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Influence of Nano-TiOACS omega · 2026Article
- Optimizing the potential use of waste palm oil clinker powder in cementitious grouts for semiflexible pavements using response surface methodology.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Simultaneous effect of ZnO nanoparticles and silica fume on the mechanical properties of the concrete.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Integrated experimental, machine learning, and life-cycle assessment of fly ash-silica fume based self-compacting geopolymer concrete.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nanotechnology has emerged as a transformative approach to enhancing the concrete properties. This research examines the impact of nano-titanium dioxide (NT) on the concrete properties. NT was incorporated in varying dosages (0.5%, 1%, and 1.5% by weight of the cement) to assess its impact on strength, toughness, and resilience. The results demonstrated a significant enhancement in mechanical properties, with a peak compressive strength of 65.20 ± 1.03 MPa, a split tensile strength of 3.44 ± 0.17 MPa, and a flexural strength of 9.5 ± 0.47 MPa at a 1.5% NT dosage after 28 days of curing. Furthermore, the long-term performance was notable, as the compressive strength further increased to 75.25 ± 1.10 MPa at 180 days, confirming the sustained strength-gain potential of NT-incorporated concrete. Also, durability assessments were conducted under aggressive conditions, including exposure to 4% NaCl, HCl, and H
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.