Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41214036›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

An emotion-oriented product evaluation model based on BP neural network and improved dempster-shafer theory.

Kun Wang, Kexiang Li, Xueqian Jiang, Chaomiao Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kun WangInstitute of Fine Arts and Design, Quanzhou Normal University, Quanzhou, 362000, China. willkende@qztc.edu.cn.
Kexiang LiInstitute of Fine Arts and Design, Quanzhou Normal University, Quanzhou, 362000, China.
Xueqian JiangFaculty of Arts, Jimei University, Xiamen, 361000, China.
Chaomiao ChenInstitute of Fine Arts and Design, Quanzhou Normal University, Quanzhou, 362000, China. li18350807378@126.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the process of user emotion-oriented product development, emotion perception has become a crucial dimension in evaluating product design. Aiming to address the issues of subjectivity bias and insufficient efficiency in multi-source information fusion in existing methods, this study proposes a hybrid product evaluation framework that integrates a back-propagation (BP) neural network and an improved Dempster-Shafer (D-S) evidence theory. The method constructs input vectors by combining product design features and user features. It utilizes multilayer BP networks to learn the nonlinear mapping relationship between product attributes and user emotions, thereby generating preliminary emotion perception probability assignments (BPA). To further address the issue of conflicting expert opinions, a weighting strategy based on the average distance of the evidence is introduced, and the D-S evidence fusion process is optimized. Ultimately, the improved evidence theory model can effectively unify the judgments of multiple experts and output a unified emotional evaluation result. The empirical study, with the sofa as the research object, shows that the proposed method can effectively identify key design elements and achieve quantitative evaluation in the emotional dimension. Through comparative experiments, this method demonstrates higher stability and adaptability in multi-source data processing and fusion accuracy, as well as good scalability, providing quantitative decision support for user-centered product design practices.

Indexed as

BP neural networkD-S evidence theoryForward designProduct evaluation

Identifiers

PMID41214036
PMCPMC12603310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.