ArticleNature communications2025
Greater benefits of immediate nirmatrelvir-ritonavir initiation for post-COVID outcomes: a population-based retrospective cohort study.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nirmatrelvir-ritonavir is generally recommended to be initiated within five days of COVID-19 symptom onset. This study examined the association between the timing of nirmatrelvir-ritonavir initiation and post-acute outcomes more precisely using territory-wide data in Hong Kong. We included patients aged ≥18 years who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 between March 16, 2022, and November 9, 2023, and were hospitalized with COVID-19. Treatment groups were formed based on the time from the positive RT-PCR date to nirmatrelvir-ritonavir initiation. Among 15,978 patients who received nirmatrelvir-ritonavir, 10,028 (62.8%) patients were included in Day 0 group, 4973 (31.1%) in Day 1 group, and 977 (6.1%) in Day 2 or later group. The control group comprised 22,312 patients who did not receive nirmatrelvir-ritonavir. Compared with the control group, the risks of post-acute mortality were significantly lower in Day 0 group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.51, 95% CI 0.46-0.56; p < 0.0001) and Day 1 group (HR 0.66, CI 0.59-0.74; p < 0.0001), but not in Day 2 or later group. Meta-regression results showed that more immediate initiation was associated with lower risks of death and all-cause hospitalization. Our findings suggested that the antiviral should be prescribed immediately after COVID-19 diagnosis for achieving its greatest benefit on improving post-COVID outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.