Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41213993›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Research on the sports training effect based on GABP neural network and artificial intelligence.

LiangFa Li, AnYing Hao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

LiangFa LiDepartment of Physical Education, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, Guangzhou, 510500, Guangdong, China.
AnYing HaoSport Art College of Guangzhou Sports University, Guangzhou, 510500, Guangdong Province, China. addorrabii34@hotmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the increasing need for precision and personalization in athletic training, artificial intelligence (AI) offers powerful tools for monitoring, evaluating, and optimizing athlete performance. This study presents a Generalized Adaptive Backpropagation (GABP) neural network that combines Genetic Algorithms (GA) with Backpropagation (BP) to model physiological adaptation and guide data-driven training decisions. The proposed system is designed specifically for sports training contexts, emphasizing real-time feedback and individualized load management based on multivariate physiological inputs. The GABP model extends traditional backpropagation networks by incorporating genetic algorithms, which accelerate convergence, reduce the risk of local minima, and enhance predictive accuracy. By integrating diverse input modalities-such as physical performance indicators, training schedules, and biometric data from wearables, video analysis, and electromyography (EMG)-the system achieves high-precision evaluation of training effectiveness. In addition to detecting fatigue and performance plateaus, the model provides interpretable insights to refine training strategies at both individual and programmatic levels. Experimental validation on physiological datasets demonstrates measurable improvements in prediction accuracy and convergence efficiency. This work contributes a domain-specific, interpretable, and adaptive modeling framework for modern sports science, supporting personalized coaching and intelligent performance monitoring.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceAthletic PerformanceNeural Networks, ComputerSportsAlgorithmsElectromyographyHumansArtificial IntelligenceAthletic Performance OptimizationGABP Neural NetworkGenetic AlgorithmSports Training

Identifiers

PMID41213993
PMCPMC12603155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.