ArticleScientific reports2025
Hysteroscopic suture fixation for levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in adenomyosis feasibility and therapeutic outcomes.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- GyneFix levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system for Chinese patients: a preliminary retrospective self-controlled observational study.BMC women's health · 2026Observational
- Failed treatment of large adenomyosis with penetrating glandular distribution using hysteroscopic LNG-IUD suture fixation: a case report and literature review.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Levonorgestrel intrauterine-releasing system (LNG-IUS), an intrauterine device, is recommended for patients with adenomyosis; however, it often shows poor outcomes in these patients because of their large uterine size. This prospective study evaluated the feasibility, short-term therapeutic effectiveness and safety of hysteroscopic suture fixation to secure the LNG-IUS in patients with adenomyosis. Forty-seven patients diagnosed with adenomyosis underwent hysteroscopic LNG-IUS suture fixation between October 2022 and January 2024, with postoperative follow-up for assessing IUD expulsion, treatment outcomes, and adverse events. Postoperative follow-up was conducted for all patients for at least 1 year. In one patient, LNG-IUS expulsion occurred at 3 months post-procedure, while in 2 patients, device displacement was detected through transvaginal sonography. Median visual analog scale scores and pictorial blood loss assessment chart scores for dysmenorrhea and heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB), respectively, were significantly decreased post-insertion. Irregular uterine bleeding emerged as the most frequent adverse event (42.6%). Two patients discontinued the therapy due to persistent dysmenorrhea or HMB. This pilot study demonstrates the technical feasibility and preliminary efficacy of hysteroscopic LNG-IUS suture fixation, with the lower short-term risk of device expulsion supporting further comparative trials. The absence of a control group is the primary limitation, necessitating cautious interpretation of outcomes as preliminary. Standardizing patient selection criteria and a comparative study with larger trials and longer-term follow-up (up to 5 years) is needed to confirm the superiority of this approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.