Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41213987›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Hysteroscopic suture fixation for levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in adenomyosis feasibility and therapeutic outcomes.

Chen Chen, Zhibin Liu, Zhen Liang, Ping Zhang, Yanlei Dong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chen ChenDepartment of Gynecology, The Second Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, 247 Beiyuan Street, Jinan, 250033, Shandong Province, China.
Zhibin LiuDepartment of Gynecology, The Second Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, 247 Beiyuan Street, Jinan, 250033, Shandong Province, China.
Zhen LiangDepartment of Gynecology, The Second Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, 247 Beiyuan Street, Jinan, 250033, Shandong Province, China.
Ping ZhangDepartment of Gynecology, The Second Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, 247 Beiyuan Street, Jinan, 250033, Shandong Province, China.
Yanlei DongDepartment of Gynecology, The Second Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, 247 Beiyuan Street, Jinan, 250033, Shandong Province, China. 13515411811@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Levonorgestrel intrauterine-releasing system (LNG-IUS), an intrauterine device, is recommended for patients with adenomyosis; however, it often shows poor outcomes in these patients because of their large uterine size. This prospective study evaluated the feasibility, short-term therapeutic effectiveness and safety of hysteroscopic suture fixation to secure the LNG-IUS in patients with adenomyosis. Forty-seven patients diagnosed with adenomyosis underwent hysteroscopic LNG-IUS suture fixation between October 2022 and January 2024, with postoperative follow-up for assessing IUD expulsion, treatment outcomes, and adverse events. Postoperative follow-up was conducted for all patients for at least 1 year. In one patient, LNG-IUS expulsion occurred at 3 months post-procedure, while in 2 patients, device displacement was detected through transvaginal sonography. Median visual analog scale scores and pictorial blood loss assessment chart scores for dysmenorrhea and heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB), respectively, were significantly decreased post-insertion. Irregular uterine bleeding emerged as the most frequent adverse event (42.6%). Two patients discontinued the therapy due to persistent dysmenorrhea or HMB. This pilot study demonstrates the technical feasibility and preliminary efficacy of hysteroscopic LNG-IUS suture fixation, with the lower short-term risk of device expulsion supporting further comparative trials. The absence of a control group is the primary limitation, necessitating cautious interpretation of outcomes as preliminary. Standardizing patient selection criteria and a comparative study with larger trials and longer-term follow-up (up to 5 years) is needed to confirm the superiority of this approach.

Indexed as

AdenomyosisHysteroscopyIntrauterine Devices, MedicatedLevonorgestrelSuture TechniquesAdultFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesSuturesTreatment OutcomeLevonorgestrelAdenomyosisHysteroscopic suture fixationLevonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system

Identifiers

PMID41213987
PMCPMC12603019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.