ArticleScientific reports2025
Predicting the binding residues of four small molecule ligands by utilizing ensemble algorithms with additional correlation features.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Novel Weighted Ensemble Framework of Transformer and Deep Q-Network for ATP-Binding Site Prediction Using Protein Language Model Features.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Precisely predicting the binding residues of protein-small molecule ligands is crucial for advancing protein functional annotation and aiding in the design of molecular drugs. However, the theoretical calculation methods based on sequence information are difficult to improve in prediction accuracy, making the prediction of small molecule ligands binding residues challenging. Here, we developed an method to precisely identify the binding residues of four small molecule ligands of ATP, ADP, GDP and NAD. The method introduced four correlation features based on sequence information: neighbor correlation, residue pairs, central motifs and PSSM correlation features. The study consistently achieved favorable results in testing on both our self-built dataset and those utilized by previous researchers. On the independent testing of our dataset, the highest values of sensitivity (Sn), specificity (Sp), accuracy (Acc), and Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) were observed for GDP (54.93%), ATP (98.68%), NAD (53.41%), and NAD (0.5341), respectively. Ablative experiments confirmed that these correlation features significantly improve the prediction results, indicating that the incorporation of correlation features plays a certain role in the recognition of protein-small molecule binding residues. This study highlights that the selected feature parameters and algorithms are instrumental in developing a robust prediction model. The source code for prediction and some results can be found at https://github.com/fendouba123/ATP-Program .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.