SynthesisESC heart failure2025
Bromocriptine in peripartum cardiomyopathy: A meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis.
Synthesis in ESC heart failure, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Bromocriptine in peripartum cardiomyopathy: A meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis.ESC heart failure · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bromocriptine has been proposed as a disease-modifying therapy for peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM). The long-term outcomes of bromocriptine use remain uncertain. We conducted a systematic review, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis (TSA) to assess the long-term efficacy and safety of bromocriptine in combination with standard care versus standard care alone in patients with PPCM. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase and Cochrane up until March 2025 for published studies comparing bromocriptine plus standard care with standard care alone in patients with PPCM. The outcomes included changes in left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction, LV end-systolic and end-diastolic dimensions, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), all-cause mortality and rehospitalization. We computed mean differences (MDs) for continuous outcomes and odds ratios (ORs) for binary endpoints with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We used TSA to assess the conclusiveness of the available evidence. A total of 12 studies [2 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 10 observational studies] and 1765 patients (age range 29-33.8 years) were included, of whom 474 (26.9%) received bromocriptine with standard care and 1291 (73.1%) received standard care alone. Compared with standard care alone, bromocriptine with standard care was associated with a significant improvement in LV ejection fraction (MD 9.98%; 95% CI: 2.86 to 17.10; P < 0.001), LV end-diastolic diameter (MD -2.51 cm; 95% CI: -4.23 to -0.79; P = 0.004), and LV end-systolic diameter (MD -5.61 cm; 95% CI: -10.03 to -1.18; P = 0.010). The proportion of patients with improved LV function was higher in those who received bromocriptine with standard care than in those who received standard care alone (OR 0.35; 95% CI: 0.16 to 0.75; P = 0.007). There were no significant differences between groups regarding the incidence of MACE, all-cause mortality or heart failure rehospitalization. The TSA showed that LV ejection fraction and diastolic dimension reached the required information size (RIS); however, only LV ejection fraction crossed the monitoring boundary before the full sample size was achieved. In this meta-analysis with TSA, the use of bromocriptine with standard care was associated with improved LV function and remodelling in patients with PPCM compared with standard care alone, with a similar effect on mortality and re-hospitalization. TSA indicated that current evidence is promising, but larger and adequately powered randomized trials are needed to confirm bromocriptine's cardioprotective effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.