ArticleeNeuro2025
Visual Speech Reduces Cognitive Effort as Measured by EEG Theta Power and Pupil Dilation.
Article in eNeuro, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Listening effort reflects the cognitive and motivational resources allocated to speech comprehension, particularly under challenging conditions. Visual cues are known to enhance speech perception, potentially by reducing the cognitive demands of the task. However, the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying this facilitation, especially in terms of effort-related changes, remain unclear. In this study, we combined pupillometry and electroencephalography (EEG) to investigate how visual speech cues modulate cognitive effort during speech recognition. Twenty-two participants (seven females) performed a speech-in-noise task under three modalities: (1) auditory-only, (2) audiovisual, and (3) visual-only. Task difficulty was manipulated via signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in the first two modalities. Firstly, we found an inverted U-shape relationship between pupil dilation and frontal midline theta with SNR for audiovisual and auditory-only speech, consistent with prior models of effort allocation. Secondly, we observed the SNR at which the neurophysiological measures peaked was at a lower SNR for audiovisual speech. Surprisingly, we found pupil dilation to be larger overall in audiovisual speech, while frontal midline theta did not show differences in either modality. These findings highlight the complexity of interpreting physiological markers of effort and suggest that visual cues may alter the temporal dynamics or resource allocation strategies during speech processing. Our results support the extension of auditory-based models of listening effort to audiovisual contexts and underscore the value of integrating multimodal neurophysiological measures to better understand the cognitive and neural mechanisms of effortful listening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.