ArticleBMJ open2025
Factors promoting eRegister and data use for evidence-based midwifery practice in Lesotho: a qualitative study.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesElectronic health register's (eRegisters) use have recently gained popularity in Africa. eRegisters are used to capture real-time patient information on several encounters with a healthcare provider. Given poor maternal and child health outcomes in Lesotho, eRegisters provide a promising innovative means of enhancing health outcomes, especially those related to midwifery. eRegisters capture maternal and newborn care services provided at healthcare facilities. Such data are important for informing evidence-based midwifery practice. Lesotho, a landlocked, sub-Saharan African country, piloted use of an eRegister in 2018. However, factors promoting eRegister and data use have not been fully documented. Therefore, this study explored factors promoting eRegister and data use for midwifery practice in Lesotho.
designThe study used a descriptive qualitative approach with interviews and focus group discussions used to collect data. Descriptive content analysis as outlined by Erlingsson and Brysiewicz (2017) was followed during data analysis.
settingThe study was conducted at three of the eRegister piloting facilities in Lesotho to examine eRegister implementation across different levels of care. Data collection occurred between December 2023 and March 2024.
participantsPurposive sampling was used to recruit healthcare workers across the three facilities. Participants were selected to capture the range of relevant roles and experience with eRegister across each facility, and 7, 6 and 5 participants were recruited.
resultsFive categories emerged as factors promoting eRegister and data use: system readiness, organisational environment, data value and utility in practice, human resource competency and digital literacy and governance and stakeholder engagement.
conclusionThis study identified critical factors that promote the use of the eRegister and data in Lesotho. The findings suggest that while external funding and partner responsiveness have been pivotal in sustaining eRegister operations, long-term sustainability will require stronger national ownership, including domestic investment in infrastructure, technical support and digital health governance. Future studies should explore the effect of eRegister use on clinical outcomes and examine strategies for scaling up digital health interventions in resource-limited settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.