Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41213701›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Core competencies for diabetes specialist nurses: a scoping review protocol.

Yawen Li, Yunfeng Li, Paulo Moreira, Tengfei Jiang, Qingxiu Tian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yawen LiDepartment of Nursing, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Jinan, Shandong, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-8910-7331
Yunfeng LiDepartment of Nursing, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Paulo MoreiraInternational Healthcare Management Research and Development Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Tengfei JiangDepartment of Nursing, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Qingxiu TianDepartment of Nursing, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Jinan, Shandong, China qingxiu_tian@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0465-3899

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDiabetes is a serious health condition that challenges a person's daily life, emotional well-being and perceived quality of life. It increases one's risk of developing other health-related complications and encountering an early death. People with diabetes require comprehensive and meticulous management through a collaborative clinical multidisciplinary team. Optimal management reduces the risk of diabetes-related health issues. Significantly, people's knowledge of diabetes and its management depends, to a large extent, on the adequacy and effectiveness of the diabetes-related care and education they receive. Diabetes specialist nurses (DSNs) are essential in diabetes care and education. The management of diabetes is rapidly changing, with advances in technologies to monitor glycaemic control, growth in new therapies and devices, and new ways of interacting with people with diabetes instead of traditional face-to-face consultations. DSNs are at the forefront in delivering diabetes care and have had to adapt their practice and learn new skills to embrace these changes. Meanwhile, the competency framework has evolved to keep abreast of these changes and ensure that nurses provide high-quality care for people with diabetes. A scoping review of the global core competencies of DSNs and identifying a worldwide framework of core competencies holds significant importance for their professional growth and role standardisation worldwide. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The scoping review will be conducted in accordance with Arksey and O'Malley's framework and the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology. Moreover, this protocol will be reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols checklist. The following online databases will be searched from the earliest available record to 4 October 2024, including CINAHL (EBSCO), Embase, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science. Grey literature will be retrieved through OAIster, Google Scholar and OpenGrey, supplemented by targeted manual searches of official websites of national diabetes associations of different countries. Study selection and data extraction of the full text will be done independently by two reviewers based on the inclusion criteria and a predetermined data extraction form. In the event of any discrepancies, they will be resolved through discussion with the third reviewer. The extracted data will be summarised and exhibited in tabular or graphical form. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study does not require ethical approval, as all data will be collected from published and grey literature. The findings will be presented at relevant conferences and submitted to peer-reviewed journals for publication.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceDiabetes MellitusNurse SpecialistsHumansResearch DesignScoping Reviews as TopicDIABETES & ENDOCRINOLOGYEDUCATION & TRAINING (see Medical Education & Training)NursesNursing CareReview

Identifiers

PMID41213701
PMCPMC12598996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.