Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41213687›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Efficacy of a novel sensory discrimination training device for the management of phantom limb pain: protocol for a randomised placebo-controlled trial.

Sarah Oatway, Denis Martin, Andrew Graham, Alan Batterham, Alasdair MacSween, Sally Smith, Deepak Ravindran, Cormac Ryan

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04103983 (An Investigation of the Efficacy of a Novel Sensory Discrimination Training Device for the Management of Phantom Limb Pain), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04103983 nacompletednot on this map

An Investigation of the Efficacy of a Novel Sensory Discrimination Training Device for the Management of Phantom Limb Pain: A Randomised, Single-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial. [PHANTOM RELIEF Trial]

TypeinterventionalSponsorTeesside UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled109ConditionsPhantom Limb PainArmsSensory retraining device
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sarah OatwayCentre for Rehabilitation, Lifestyle Medicine and Human Performance, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK s.oatway@tees.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-1281-9977
Denis MartinTeesside University SSSHL, Middlesbrough, UK.
Andrew GrahamTeesside University SSSHL, Middlesbrough, UK.
Alan BatterhamTeesside University SSSHL, Middlesbrough, UK.
Alasdair MacSweenTeesside University SSSHL, Middlesbrough, UK.
Sally SmithJames Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK.
Deepak RavindranRoyal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust, Reading, UK.
Cormac RyanTeesside University SSSHL, Middlesbrough, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5864-4325

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMany amputees experience phantom limb pain (PLP). Pharmacological management is the mainstay of treatment, but effectiveness is limited, and it is associated with significant side effects. Sensory discrimination training (SDT) is a non-pharmacological treatment for PLP. Previously, SDT required a clinician, or carer, to administer it, creating a barrier to real world use. In this trial, an automated SDT device (SP1X, 2pd Ltd, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom) for the self-management of PLP will be investigated for efficacy. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The Phantom Relief is a decentralised, randomised, placebo-controlled, mixed-methods, superiority trial. Participants will take part from their own homes, using an electronic data capture tool to complete all trial documentation. Eligible, consenting individuals with PLP (intensity rated as ≥4 on a 0-10 scale; n=100) will be randomised to receive the SP1X device (intervention group) or a placebo device SP1X7 (placebo group). The first and second treatment sessions will be observed via video call to provide set-up guidance and any additional advice needed. The primary outcome measure will be the McGill Pain Questionnaire revised (SF-MPQ-2). Outcome measures will be collected at baseline, 3 weeks (immediately post intervention) and 3 months follow-up. Statistical analysis will be carried out by a blinded statistician (analysis of covariance model conditioning on the baseline and stratification factors). Semi-structured interviews will be carried out with a sub-sample (n=10-15) of intervention group participants. Participants will be provided with their allocated device for home use. Online video calls will be used to instruct participants on how to set up and use the device by the research assistant (RA). The RA will observe the first and second treatment sessions and provide any additional advice needed. Participants in both groups will be asked to use the device for 60 min/day for at least 15 days of the 21-day treatment period and to record device use in a study diary. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Approval has been obtained from Teesside University School of Health and Life Sciences Research and Ethics Committee, the North of Scotland Research Ethics Service, Health Research Authority, and a letter of no objection was obtained from the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Authority. The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed articles, conference presentations and a doctoral thesis. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04103983.

Indexed as

Pain ManagementPhantom LimbSelf-ManagementAdultEquivalence Trials as TopicFemaleHumansMalePain MeasurementRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeAmputation, SurgicalChronic PainClinical TrialNeurological painPain managementSelf-Help Devices

Identifiers

PMID41213687
PMCPMC12598989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.