Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41213672›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Integrating equity into hospital incident reporting and patient concerns systems: study protocol for a mixed methods study.

Joanne Goldman, Allison Kooijman, Ayelet Kuper, Maitreya Coffey, Brian M Wong, Patricia Trbovich, Equity in Patient Safety Incident Reporting and Patient Concerns Study Group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Joanne GoldmanUniversity of Toronto Centre for Quality Improvement and Patient Safety, Toronto, Ontario, Canada joanne.goldman@utoronto.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1589-4070
Allison KooijmanSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Health and Social Development, The University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada.
Ayelet KuperDepartment of Medicine, University of Toronto Temerty Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Maitreya CoffeyCenter for Clinical Excellence, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Brian M WongUniversity of Toronto Centre for Quality Improvement and Patient Safety, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Patricia TrbovichUniversity of Toronto Centre for Quality Improvement and Patient Safety, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8120-5926
Equity in Patient Safety Incident Reporting and Patient Concerns Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPreventable hospital patient harm events disproportionally affect certain patient populations. For some, harm extends beyond physical injury to include cultural, emotional or spiritual impacts. While these disparities are linked to socio-demographics (eg, race, education), they are driven by structural factors (eg, procedures and policies). Patient safety monitoring systems (eg, incident reporting, patient concerns) were not originally designed to identify equity-related harms and may inadvertently obscure or reinforce the injustices they should address. This study will examine how equity is currently considered within hospital incident reporting and patient concerns systems across Canada and will identify opportunities to strengthen these systems' responsiveness to inequities in patient safety. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This 3-year exploratory sequential mixed-method study began in September 2024. Phase one involves qualitative interviews with patient safety and equity leads, patients/families/caregivers and leaders of innovative initiatives to explore current practices, gaps and innovations in how equity-related factors are identified and addressed within incident reporting and patient concerns systems. Findings will inform Phase 2, a modified Delphi process with patient safety and equity experts and persons with lived experience of equity-related harm events to refine and reach consensus on key equity-promoting features, considerations and recommendations for these systems. In Phase 3, consensus items will be used to develop a national cross-sectional survey assessing the extent to which equity is integrated into hospital incident reporting and patient concerns systems in Canada. A patient advisory committee will inform data collection, interpretation of findings and dissemination. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval has been received for Phase 1, with subsequent approvals to be sought for later phases. Dissemination plans include peer-reviewed publications, presentations at international conferences and knowledge exchange activities to inform patient engagement, the design of incident reporting and patient concerns systems and policy development.

Indexed as

Health EquityHospitalsPatient SafetyRisk ManagementCanadaCross-Sectional StudiesDelphi TechniqueHumansQualitative ResearchResearch DesignHealth EquityHospitalsQUALITATIVE RESEARCHQuality in health careSafetySurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID41213672
PMCPMC12598986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.