Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41213668›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Evaluation of the efficacy of PREVENIR (PREVention ENvIronment Reproduction) platforms on urinary markers of chemical exposure in pregnant women: protocol for an unblinded randomised clinical trial (PREVENIR-G).

Fleur Delva, Loïc Sentilhes, Florence Francis-Oliviero, Vincent Bessonneau, Claire Sunyach, Carine Audouin, Christophe Paris, Bassam Haddad, Mireille Matrat, Jean-Claude Pairon and 5 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06642818 (Evaluation of the Effectiveness of PREVENIR), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06642818 nanot yet recruitingnot on this map

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of PREVENIR (PREVention ENvIronnement Reproduction) Platforms on Urinary Markers of Chemical Exposures - Unblinded Randomized Clinical Trial. PREVENIR-G

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, BordeauxRan2025 to 2027Enrolled300ConditionsPregnancy, Environmental Exposure, PreventionArmsprotocolized interview and prevention messages
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Fleur DelvaCIC-EC, Univ Bordeaux, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France fleur.delva@chu-bordeaux.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5594-5405
Loïc SentilhesCHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0009-3625
Florence Francis-OlivieroCIC-EC, Univ Bordeaux, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5435-5064
Vincent BessonneauIRSET, Rennes, Brittany, France.
Claire SunyachAP-HM, Marseille, France.
Carine AudouinCHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Christophe ParisIRSET, Rennes, Brittany, France.
Bassam HaddadCentre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Créteil, Créteil, France.
Mireille MatratCentre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Créteil, Créteil, France.
Jean-Claude PaironCentre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Créteil, Créteil, France.
Milia BelacelCentre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Créteil, Créteil, France.
Rémi SittaCHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Tamara RobertsCHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Florence BretelleAP-HM, Marseille, France.
Ronan GarlantezecIRSET, Rennes, Brittany, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIt has been reported that pregnant women used more cosmetics daily than non-pregnant women. Phenoxyacetic acid is the main metabolite of phenoxyethanol, the most frequent preservative in cosmetics used in Europe, previously associated with reproductive effects (longer time to conception, endocrine disruptors in newborns and poorer verbal comprehension in children). In France, specialised platforms (PREVention ENvIronment Reproduction (PREVENIR)) in university hospital maternity wards are dedicated to evaluating environmental and occupational exposures in patients with pregnancy-related pathologies and supporting targeted prevention efforts. These platforms are composed of occupational health physicians, obstetrician-gynaecologists, midwives, occupational health nurses, and occupational health and environmental engineers. To assess the efficacy of these platforms, we developed a randomised clinical trial, the protocol for which is presented in this paper. The primary objective of the PREVENIR-G Study is to compare the change in urinary phenoxyacetic acid concentrations from baseline to 3 months postintervention between an intervention group and a control group. To date, the intervention has been integrated into routine care in certain facilities; however, its efficacy remains unproven. It is therefore essential to assess the relevance of this intervention, considering both its potential benefits and any adverse effects, such as increased stress or anxiety. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study is an unblinded, randomised clinical superiority trial with two parallel groups (intervention vs no intervention) in four university maternity hospitals in France. We will include 300 pregnant women (aged 18 years or older) who are under 24 weeks of gestation (150 per group) referred to the participating PREVENIR platforms for management. The intervention will consist of clinical prevention management through the PREVENIR platforms, involving a consultation with an environmental health expert for an assessment of environmental and occupational exposures. During the consultation, targeted prevention messages will be provided based on identified exposures. The no intervention comparator will be a waiting-list control group. At the inclusion visit, patients will receive urine collection vials for samples to be collected at baseline and again at 3 months. Urine samples will be collected twice in a single day, on three separate days, during the collection week at home. In the week following the urine collection period, only participants in the intervention group will engage with the PREVENIR platforms. The primary outcome will be the difference in the urinary phenoxyacetic acid concentration between baseline and 3 months postintervention, compared between the intervention and control groups. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by the hospital ethics committee (CCP Ouest 2, no. 2023-A00941-44). All participants will provide written informed consent. Results will be shared through presentations and publications. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06642818.

Indexed as

Environmental ExposureEthylene GlycolsOccupational ExposureAdultBiomarkersEquivalence Trials as TopicFemaleFranceHumansPregnancyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicBiomarkersEthylene GlycolsClinical TrialPregnancyPreventive Medicine

Identifiers

PMID41213668
PMCPMC12598991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.