Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41213657›Full record

GuidelineArquivos de neuro-psiquiatria2025

2025 Brazilian guidelines for the management of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder in adults and children.

Samira Luisa Dos Apóstolos-Pereira, Alfredo Damasceno, Ana Claudia Piccolo, Maria Fernanda Mendes, Maria Lúcia Brito, Regina Alvarenga, Bruna Klein da Costa, Douglas Kazutochi Sato, Doralina Guimarães Brum, Elisa Mello and 15 more

Abstract readPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Samira Luisa Dos Apóstolos-PereiraUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Serviço de Neurologia, São Paulo SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3493-1199
Alfredo DamascenoUniversidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7919-3989
Ana Claudia PiccoloUniversidade Municipal de São Caetano do Sul, São Paulo SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0834-1056
Maria Fernanda MendesSanta Casa de São Paulo, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Disciplina de Neurologia, São Paulo SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3983-6019
Maria Lúcia BritoHospital da Restauração, Recife PE, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6136-4612
Regina AlvarengaUniversidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Pós-Graduação Stricto Sensu em Neurologia, Rio de Janeiro RJ, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1141-8619
Bruna Klein da CostaPontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre RS, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4752-2717
Douglas Kazutochi SatoHospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Serviço de Neurologia, Porto Alegre RS, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7695-6020
Doralina Guimarães BrumUniversidade Estadual Paulista, Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, Botucatu SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9050-3319
Elisa MelloSanta Casa de São Paulo, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, São Paulo SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6448-8277
Felipe von GlehnUniversidade de Brasília, Brasília DF, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1004-7641
Giordani PassosPontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Hospital São Lucas, Porto Alegre RS, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8949-6115
Guilherme DiogoUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, São Paulo SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9764-3763
Herval Soares NetoHospital do Servidor Público Estadual de São Paulo, São Paulo SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1694-0457
Lis CamposUniversidade Federal de Sergipe, Aracajú SE, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4456-2684
Manuela FragomeniHospital da Criança de Brasília, Brasília DF, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0005-9942-7649
Milena de Sales PitombeiraHospital Geral de Fortaleza, Divisão de Neurologia, Fortaleza CE, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3298-0264
Rafael PaternoIrmandade da Santa Casa de São Paulo, Serviço de Neurologia, São Paulo SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7649-0195
Raquel VassãoSanta Casa de Belo Horizonte, Clínica Neurológica, Belo Horizonte MG, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7932-3413
Renata Barbosa PaoliloUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Instituto da Criança, São Paulo SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3548-8467
Tarso AdoniUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Serviço de Neurologia, São Paulo SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5008-2783
Thiago FukudaUniversidade Federal da Bahia, Hospital Universitário Professor Edgar Santos, Salvador BA, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7718-4288
Vanessa DaccachUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Hospital das Clínicas, Ribeirão Preto SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2131-9438
Jefferson BeckerPontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre RS, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9981-3620
Claudia Cristina Ferreira VasconcelosUniversidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Pós-Graduação Stricto Sensu em Neurologia, Rio de Janeiro RJ, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0833-4024

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a debilitating recurrent inflammatory disease of the central nervous system. Establishing management guidelines is essential to optimize patient care in Brazil.To combine the Delphi and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approaches to validate evidence-based guideline statements for NMOSD treatment.These guidelines focused on providing recommendations for different scenarios: general management and diagnosis of NMOSD; acute and preventive treatments (including systemic immunosuppressants and anti-B cell, anti-interleukin-6, and anti-complement monoclonal antibodies); and therapeutic approaches in special groups (such as the pediatric population and pregnant women). A literature review based on the Population, Intervention, Comparator, and Outcome (PICO) framework was performed, and studies were evaluated using the GRADE system. An initial questionnaire containing 19 statements was sent to 44 specialists from all regions of Brazil.Three voting rounds were necessary to reach consensus in all statements. After the first voting round, 17 statements reached consensus (level of agreement > 70%). Two statements failed to reach consensus and were, thus, revised. One of them was segmented into three different statements. After the second voting round, three out of the four revised statements reached consensus. Upon further revision, the last statement was again submitted to voting, reaching consensus in this third round. Overall, agreement was achieved on the 21 proposed statements.The primary objective in the management of NMOSD is to mitigate the severity of the attacks and prevent relapses, thereby minimizing the risk of irreversible neurological deficits. The statements in the current guideline offer evidence-based recommendations for such management within the Brazilian context.

Indexed as

Neuromyelitis OpticaAdultBrazilChildConsensusDelphi TechniqueEvidence-Based MedicineFemaleHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsPregnancyImmunosuppressive Agents

Identifiers

PMID41213657
PMCPMC12602111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.