ArticleMelanoma research2026
Retro- and prospective histologic and immunohistochemical analysis of safety margins following complete excision of less than 1 mm melanomas.
Article in Melanoma research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Narrow Excision Margins for Diverse Histological Subtypes of Cutaneous Melanoma in Children and Adults: A Systematic Review.Dermatology and therapy · 2026Pooled it
- PRAME Expression and Melanoma In Situ Margin Assessment.The American Journal of dermatopathology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reexcisions for melanoma do rarely present residual melanoma. To analyze the number of positive margins in reexcisions of in situ and <1 mm melanomas. To see whether the immunohistochemical (IHC) panel (Preferentially expressed antigen of melanoma (PRAME), Sry-related HMg-Box gene 10 (SOX 10), Human melanoma black 45 (HMB45), and Melan A) detected additional cases of melanoma. Three pilot cohorts (retrospective, prospective, and direct safety margins) were analyzed on the persistence of melanoma in reexcisions. Among the 97 cases of the retrospective cohort (27 in situ and 69 invasive melanomas), one residual in situ melanoma was detected in the reexcisions. In the second cohort, among 81 cases (18 in situ and 63 invasive melanomas), two cases (2.5%) presented in situ melanoma. In the group where direct margins were taken ( n = 21) 2 (9.5%) in situ melanoma were evidenced in the margins. The IHC panel was needed to confirm three additional in situ melanomas in cohort 2. In a total of 178 cases (97 + 81) of reexcision, three and five cases (1.7 and 3.4%) of in situ melanoma were evidenced after H/E and IHC, respectively. These pilot data could question the usefulness of reexcision in <1 mm melanomas, particularly as only cases of in situ melanoma were detected. Larges prospective series would be required to answer this issue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.