ArticleThe Journal of surgical research2025
Preinjury Antithrombotic Use in Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury Varies by Level of Trauma Center.
Article in The Journal of surgical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe use of antiplatelet and anticoagulant medications is increasingly common and complicates treatment after traumatic brain injury. Population demographics and resource availability, specifically access to platelet function assays and antiplatelet and anticoagulant reversal strategies, differ among trauma centers. In this study, we aimed to describe the differences in the antiplatelet and anticoagulant status and interventions received for patients with traumatic brain injury between level I and level III trauma centers. MATERIALS AND
methodsRetrospective review of patients diagnosed with traumatic brain injury from January through December 2022 was completed, including patients from level I and level III trauma centers within the same health system. Univariate analyses were then performed examining patient demographic information, anticoagulant and antiplatelet status, and rates of reversal agents administered and neurosurgical interventions received.
resultsA total of 531 patients were included. Patients who arrived to our level III trauma center compared to level I trauma center via scene admission were more likely to be older (75 versus 54 ys) and on antiplatelet (42 versus 22%) and anticoagulant (21 versus 9%) agents, and subsequently their care more often included anticoagulant reversal (10 versus 2%) (P < 0.05). These findings were replicated when looking at the level I trauma center scene arrival versus transfer cohorts.
conclusionsThe populations served by lower-level trauma centers continue to age, and the care of traumatic brain injury is further complicated by preinjury anticoagulant and antiplatelet use. Trauma centers need to continually adapt to ensure they are equipped with the necessary resources required to provide their patients with optimal care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.