Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41213124›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2025

Resistance Exercise Therapy After COVID-19 Infection: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Colin Berry, Gemma McKinley, Hannah K Bayes, David Anderson, Chim Choy Lang, Adam Gill, Andrew Morrow, Robert Sykes, Diann Taggart, Anna Kamdar and 4 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter StudyPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04900961 (Prevention and Early Treatment of the Long-term Physical Effects of Coronarvirus-19), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04900961 nacompletednot on this map

Prevention and Early Treatment of the Long-term Physical Effects of Coronarvirus-19 (COVID-19): a Randomised Clinical Trial of Resistance Exercise.

TypeinterventionalSponsorNHS Greater Glasgow and ClydeRan2021 to 2025Enrolled233ConditionsCovid19ArmsResistance Exercise
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Colin BerryBritish Heart Foundation Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, School of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Health, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Gemma McKinleyRobertson Centre for Biostatistics, School of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Hannah K BayesDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Royal Infirmary, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde Health Board, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
David AndersonDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde Health Board, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Chim Choy LangDivision of Cardiovascular Research, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom.
Adam GillClinical Research Facility, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde Health Board, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Andrew MorrowBritish Heart Foundation Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, School of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Health, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Robert SykesBritish Heart Foundation Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, School of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Health, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Diann TaggartNHS Project Management Unit, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde Health Board, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Anna KamdarBritish Heart Foundation Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, School of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Health, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Paul WelshBritish Heart Foundation Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, School of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Health, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Susan DawkesSchool of Health and Social Care, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Alex McConnachieRobertson Centre for Biostatistics, School of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Stuart R GrayBritish Heart Foundation Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, School of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Health, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Long COVID presents an unmet therapeutic need. Objective: To determine the effects of a resistance exercise intervention on exercise capacity, health status, and safety among adults after COVID-19 infection. Design, Setting, and Participants: A 2-arm, multicenter, randomized clinical trial including 233 adults with a hospital or community diagnosis of COVID-19 infection in the preceding 12 months was undertaken from June 1, 2021, to April 26, 2024. The intervention group comprised 117 individuals, and the control group comprised 116 individuals. A total of 224 individuals at baseline and 193 individuals at 3 months completed Incremental Shuttle Walk Tests. Exposures: The intervention group received the personalized resistance exercise intervention for 3 months, and the control group received treatment as usual. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the distance achieved (in meters) in the Incremental Shuttle Walk Test undertaken 3 months after randomization. Secondary outcome measures included health-related quality of life (measured by the European Quality of Life 5-Dimension 5-Level Instrument [EQ-5D-5L]), anxiety and depression (measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire), and grip strength. Results: A total of 233 adults (median age, 53.6 years [IQR, 43.8-60.8 years]; 146 women [62.7%]; 91 [39.1%] hospitalized with COVID-19 infection) were randomized (117 [50.2%] to the intervention group and 116 [49.8%] to the control group). The median percentage adherence with the exercise intervention was 71.0% (IQR, 47.8%-96.8%), equivalent to performing the exercises 5 days per week. The mean (SD) distance achieved in the Incremental Shuttle Walk Test was 328 (225) m for 224 individuals at baseline and 389 (249) m for 193 individuals at follow-up. The mean (SD) change in Incremental Shuttle Walk Test distance at 3 months compared with baseline was 83 (118) m in the intervention group (n = 94) and 47 (95) m in the control group (n = 98) (adjusted mean difference, 36.5 m [95% CI, 6.6-66.3 m]; P = .02). By 3 months, compared with the control group, greater improvements in the intervention group were also observed for the health-related quality of life utility score (EQ-5D-5L) (0.06 [95% CI, 0.01-0.11]; P = .02), Patient Health Questionnaire category (0.5 [95% CI, 0.2-0.8]; P = .01), and handgrip strength (2.6 kg [95% CI, 0.9-4.2 kg]; P = .002). Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, a 3-month program of resistance exercise among adults after COVID-19 infection appeared to improve walking distance, health-related quality of life, anxiety, depression, and grip strength. This pragmatic intervention may be a generalizable therapy for individuals with persisting physical symptoms after COVID-19 infection. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04900961.

Indexed as

COVID-19Exercise TherapyResistance TrainingAdultAgedExercise ToleranceFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeSARS-CoV-2Treatment OutcomeWalk Test

Identifiers

PMID41213124
PMCPMC12603858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.