Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41212896›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2025

A Bayesian neural ordinary differential equations framework to study the effects of chemical mixtures on survival.

Virgile Baudrot, Nina Cedergreen, Thomas Kleiber, André Gergs, Sandrine Charles

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Virgile BaudrotQonfluens, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1327-9728
Nina CedergreenUniversity of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-4724-9447
Thomas KleiberQonfluens, Montpellier, France.
André GergsBayer AG, Monheim, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1752-1342
Sandrine CharlesUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4604-0166

Funding

Bayer AG
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the field of Plant Protection Products (PPP), the combination of multiple active ingredients is a common strategy to improve the efficacy against target species. However, these mixtures may expose non-target species to untested chemical combinations due to varied application and degradation pathways. Developing a method to predict the effects of such mixtures without extensive testing is crucial for enhancing risk assessment for non-target organisms. Toxicokinetic (TK) and toxicodynamic (TD) models currently provide predictive power for the toxicity of mixture over time, utilizing the concentration addition and independent action principles. However, their capacity to capture complex, non-linear interactions - such as synergistic and antagonistic effects - remains limited. To overcome these limitations, we introduce a new methodology that integrates TKTD models using Ordinary Differential Equations (ODE) with neural networks (NN), offering a robust framework for modeling complex substance interactions. The ODE component encodes fundamental biological principles that constrain the neural network to biologically plausible solutions. Bayesian inference further refines the model by addressing uncertainties in data, model parameters, and biological processes, while also allowing quantification of prediction uncertainty, highlighting gaps in experimental data that warrant further investigation. This hybrid model was evaluated across 99 acute toxicity studies that included various PPP mixtures, testing its ability to identify and forecast deviations from expected mixture behaviors. Our findings demonstrate that while simpler linear models provide a robust and parsimonious baseline for predicting additive mixture effects, the neural network component serves as a powerful tool for selectively identifying and forecasting significant non-linear deviations from these expectations. This dual approach clarifies the distinct roles of both simple and complex models, providing a more responsible framework to anticipate the combined effects of untested chemical mixtures and inform risk assessment practices.

Indexed as

Complex MixturesModels, BiologicalNeural Networks, ComputerAnimalsBayes TheoremComputational BiologyComputer SimulationRisk AssessmentToxicokineticsComplex Mixtures

Identifiers

PMID41212896
PMCPMC12674509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.