ArticleJournal of the American Chemical Society2025
MOF-ChemUnity: Literature-Informed Large Language Models for Metal-Organic Framework Research.
Article in Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI for Accelerated Materials Discovery: From Generative Design to Autonomous Realization.Chemical reviews · 2026Article
- Digital Reticular Chemistry: How Artificial Intelligence is Redefining Covalent Organic Framework Research.JACS Au · 2026Review
- Interrogating the synthetic likelihood of metal-organic frameworks: a digital discovery perspective.Chemical science · 2026Review
- Data Management and Analysis of Metal-Organic Framework Synthesis Using Data Models.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence at the Intersection of Chemistry and Materials Science.AI (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming research in metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), where models trained on structured computational data routinely predict new materials and optimize their properties. This raises a central question: What if we could leverage the full breadth of MOF knowledge, not just structured data sets, but also the scientific literature? For researchers, the literature remains the primary source of knowledge, yet much of its content, including experimental data and expert insight, remains underutilized by AI systems. We introduce MOF-ChemUnity, a structured, extensible, and scalable knowledge graph that unifies MOF data by linking literature-derived insights to crystal structures and computational data sets. By disambiguating MOF names in the literature and connecting them to crystal structures in the Cambridge Structural Database, MOF-ChemUnity unifies experimental and computational sources and enables cross-document knowledge extraction and linking. We showcase how this enables multiproperty machine learning across simulated and experimental data, compilation of complete synthesis records for individual compounds by aggregating information across multiple publications, and expert-guided materials recommendations via structure-based machine learning descriptors for pore geometry and chemistry. When used as a knowledge source to augment large language models (LLMs), MOF-ChemUnity enables a literature-informed AI assistant that operates over the full scope of MOF knowledge. Expert evaluations show improved accuracy, interpretability, and trustworthiness across tasks such as retrieval, inference of structure-property relationships, and materials recommendation, outperforming standard LLMs. This work lays the foundation for literature-informed materials discovery, enabling both scientists and AI systems to reason over the full existing knowledge in a new way.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.