ArticleJNCI cancer spectrum2025
Prospective assessment of health-related quality of life in early phase oncology clinical trials: PEARLER.
Article in JNCI cancer spectrum, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionHealth-related quality of life (HRQoL) is not routine in early phase clinical trials (EP-CTs), which focus on dose-limiting toxicities and safety. However, for clinicians, understanding the impact of such trials on HRQoL is fundamental to consent patients, especially when the benefits on tumor response may be unknown. AIMS AND
methodsThe PEARLER (Patient diversity And experience in eaRLy phase cancEr clinical tRials) study was conducted with a key aim of focusing on assessing HRQoL in participants undergoing EP-CTs using a multi-center prospective cohort setting. All participants completed a baseline demographic survey on Cycle 1 Day 1 with EORTC-QLQ-C30 on Day 1 of Cycles 1 through 6 or end of treatment (EoT).
resultsOverall, 122 participants were recruited with median age 62. Median baseline Global Health Status (GHS) was 67 and remained unchanged throughout EP-CT (P = .188). GHS deterioration occurred in 29/122 (24%) while improvement occurred in 16/122 (13%). Median baseline Physical Function Score (PFS) was 87. PFS deterioration occurred in 30/122 (25%) while improvement occurred in 6/122 (5%). Baseline median CFS was 84. Cognitive Function Score (CFS) deterioration occurred in 25/122 (20%) while improvement occurred in 20/122 (16%). Baseline median Emotional Function Score (EFS) was 77. EFS deterioration occurred in 14/122 (11%) while improvement occurred in 14/122 (11%). Presence of liver metastases was a negative predictive marker for GHS, CFS, and EFS over time (P = .01, P < .01, and P < .01).
conclusionPEARLER is the first prospective cohort study investigating change in HRQoL over time in patients undergoing EP-CTs. Reassuringly, almost three-quarters of participants who undertake EP-CTs either sustain or improve their GHS or PFS. Presence of liver metastases appears to be a negative predictive marker of HRQoL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.