ArticleThe European journal of general practice2025
Experiences of supporting primary and community healthcare workers affected by domestic abuse in the United Kingdom: A cross-sectional survey.
Article in The European journal of general practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From subtle symptoms to disclosure: Communication in violence detection in primary care.The European journal of general practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHealthcare workers are expected to identify and respond to domestic abuse among patients. However, research has neglected healthcare workers' own experiences of domestic abuse.
objectivesFocusing on UK primary and community healthcare workers with formal support roles (e.g. line managers, human resources, employee assistance professionals), this exploratory study aimed to illustrate workplace support offered to healthcare colleagues affected by domestic abuse.
methodWe used an online cross-sectional survey with closed and qualitative free-text questions, advertised via mailing lists and social media, targeting healthcare workers. Our mixed methods embedded design involved quantitative descriptive analysis with content analysis of qualitative free text to explain and interrogate results.
resultsSixty-two people in healthcare roles supporting colleagues responded, mostly from community hospitals, dentistry, and general practice. Few workplaces had staff domestic abuse policies. Support measures were limited. Emotional support, signposting, and adjusted working hours were the most common types of support available. Training on supporting affected colleagues was rare. Few environments had specialist domestic abuse advocates who supported staff. Along with needing policies, training, and in-house support, respondents indicated a need for a cultural shift to address myths about domestic abuse and hierarchical power, particularly regarding healthcare workers who perpetrate abuse.
conclusionDespite several limitations, including substantial missing data, our work highlights that primary and community healthcare workplaces should explore the implementation of practical and emotional support measures; healthcare-based domestic abuse advocates with staff support; and training on supporting colleagues. Further pan-European comparative research should surface good practice and foster cross-learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.