Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41212643›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of general practice2025

Implementing a sepsis prediction score in out-of-hours primary care: Feasibility and acceptability study.

Feike J Loots, Lonneke A van Vught, Minou van den Brande, Sophie Jepma, Bryce Renkema, Arthur R H van Zanten, Karin Kaasjager, Ann Van den Bruel, Johannes B Reitsma, Kevin Jenniskens and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of general practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Feike J LootsDepartment of General Practice and Nursing Science, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4984-0484
Lonneke A van VughtDepartment of General Practice and Nursing Science, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Minou van den BrandeDepartment of General Practice and Nursing Science, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Sophie JepmaDepartment of General Practice and Nursing Science, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Bryce RenkemaDepartment of General Practice and Nursing Science, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Arthur R H van ZantenDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Ziekenhuis Gelderse Vallei, Ede, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6276-7192
Karin KaasjagerDivision of Acute Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Ann Van den BruelDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-9012-2009
Johannes B ReitsmaDepartment of Epidemiology and Global Health, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4026-4345
Kevin JenniskensDepartment of Epidemiology and Global Health, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3724-8424
Abeer AhmadDepartment of General Practice and Nursing Science, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Sibyl AnthierensDepartment of Family Medicine and Population Health, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-4762-1907
Roderick P VenekampDepartment of General Practice and Nursing Science, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1446-9614

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical scoring systems can help predict sepsis and guide treatment. We developed and validated a new sepsis prediction score for acutely ill adult patients visited at home by a general practitioner (GP) of an out-of-hours (OOH) cooperative.

aimTo assess the feasibility and acceptability of implementing this score during OOH home visits. DESIGN AND

settingTheory-informed mixed-methods study at two OOH GP cooperatives in the Netherlands between January and June 2024.

methodGPs calculated the sepsis score in adult patients during home visits and completed a questionnaire about uptake and usability. Perspectives and experiences were explored through focus groups and semi-structured interviews.

results106 GPs visited 271 patients at home, of whom 105 were judged acutely ill by the GP. The score's uptake was 77% in all patients and 85% in those acutely ill. 91% of GPs rated the score as convenient to use, and 66% considered the score reliable and accurate. GPs reported that the score influenced their decision to refer the patient to the hospital in 6% (15/271; 11 referred, four not referred) of all cases and 10% (10/105, all referred) in acutely ill. GPs expressed that they did not solely rely on the score but found it helpful to raise sepsis awareness and as an adjunct to clinical decision-making.

conclusionImplementing a new score for acutely ill adult patients visited at home during OOH primary care is feasible, and deemed acceptable and useful by GPs, however future research focusing on clinical validation and cost-effectiveness is needed.

Indexed as

After-Hours CareGeneral PractitionersPrimary Health CareSepsisAdultAgedFeasibility StudiesFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsSurveys and Questionnairesacceptabilityfeasibilityimplementationout-of-hours general practitioner cooperativeprediction scoreSepsis

Identifiers

PMID41212643
PMCPMC12604108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.