Dehydrogenation vs Apparent Hydrogenation: Unraveling the Mechanisms of He and O

Santosh Shaw, Tiago Silva, Jonathan M Bobbitt, Fabian Naab, Cleber L Rodrigues, Emily A Smith, Ludovico Cademartiri

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in ACS applied materials & interfaces, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Santosh ShawDepartment of Materials Science & Engineering, Iowa State University of Science and Technology, Ames, Iowa 50011, United States.

Tiago SilvaInstituto de Física, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-090, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7643-2198

Jonathan M BobbittDepartment of Chemistry, Iowa State University of Science and Technology, Ames, Iowa 50011, United States.

Fabian NaabMichigan Ion Beam Laboratory, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States.

Cleber L RodriguesInstituto de Física, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-090, Brazil.

Emily A SmithDepartment of Chemistry, Iowa State University of Science and Technology, Ames, Iowa 50011, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7438-7808

Ludovico CademartiriDepartment of Chemistry, Life Sciences and Environmental Sustainability, University of Parma, 43012 Parma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8805-9434

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Removing organic ligands from colloidal nanoparticles is critical for fabricating solid-state devices, yet accurately quantifying this removal remains a significant analytical challenge. Here, we establish a robust and accessible method for this quantification by calibrating Raman spectroscopy against precise ion beam analysis (IBA) for nanoparticle assemblies (CNAs) processed by helium (He) and oxygen (O

Indexed as

colloidal nanocrystalsetchingion beam analysisligand strippingnanocrystal processingplasmasRaman spectroscopythin films

Identifiers

PMID41212636

DOI10.1021/acsami.5c14331

PMCPMC12635958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.