ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2025
Uncertainty-aware genomic classification of Alzheimer's disease: a transformer-based ensemble approach with Monte Carlo dropout.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Harnessing Deep Learning Models for Guide RNA Optimization and Off-Target Prediction in CRISPR Systems.Biotechnology journal · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD) has complex genetic factors that make accurate prediction from genomic data challenging. Current methods lack confidence estimates for their predictions. Our objective is to develop and evaluate an uncertainty-aware deep learning framework for AD prediction that can identify which predictions are reliable. We developed Transformer-based, Uncertainty-aware, Ensemble Network (TrUE-Net), a deep learning framework that combines transformer and random forest models to predict AD from whole-genome sequencing data. The key innovation is using Monte Carlo Dropout to estimate prediction confidence, allowing the model to identify cases where it is uncertain. We analyzed 1050 individuals (607 AD, 443 controls) from Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative cohort. On 525 test samples, accuracy of TrUE-Net without uncertainty threshold was 65.1% with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.664. Using uncertainty thresholds, the model classified 75.4% of samples (n = 396) as 'uncertain' and 24.6% (n = 129) as 'certain'. The uncertain group showed accuracy of 62.6% and F1 of 0.584, while the certain group showed accuracy of 72.9% and F1 of 0.821. Uncertainty quantification through Monte Carlo Dropout provides a framework for assessing prediction reliability in genomic AD classification, potentially allowing more informed interpretation of model outputs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.