ArticleCancer medicine2025
Artificial Intelligence Chatbots and Their Responses to Most Searched Spanish Cancer Questions.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dermatology "AI Babylon": Cross-Language Evaluation of AI-Crafted Dermatology Descriptions.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence Chatbots and Their Responses to Most Searched Spanish Cancer Questions.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundArtificial intelligence (AI) chatbots perform well in answering English cancer questions. For Spanish, their performance is unknown and may differ by free vs. paywall versions.
methodsWe evaluated the quality (range: 1-5 points), actionability (range: 0-100%), and readability (range: 1-13 grades) of six popular AI chatbots in responding to the 15 most searched Spanish questions regarding breast, prostate, and colon cancer.
resultsThe quality of overall AI chatbot responses was good (mean [95% CI]: 3.5 [3.4-3.6] points), while the actionability was low (mean [95% CI]: 35.6% [30.8%-40.3%]). The readability was high-school-level (mean [95% CI]: 9.2 [8.8-9.6] grades), not concordant with the American Medical Association recommendation (≤ 6th grade). The quality, actionability, and readability did not differ by free and paywall versions (p > 0.05).
conclusionOur findings suggested AI chatbots may generate good-quality responses to Spanish cancer questions, regardless of free or paywall versions. However, further improvement in actionability and readability is needed to benefit Spanish-speaking patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.